Logo
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • English 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   University of Thessaly Institutional Repository
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • View Item
  •   University of Thessaly Institutional Repository
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Institutional repository
All of DSpace
  • Communities & Collections
  • By Issue Date
  • Authors
  • Titles
  • Subjects

Tumor-treating fields as a fourth treating modality for glioblastoma: a meta-analysis

Thumbnail
Author
Magouliotis D.E., Asprodini E.K., Svokos K.A., Tasiopoulou V.S., Svokos A.A., Toms S.A.
Date
2018
Language
en
DOI
10.1007/s00701-018-3536-6
Keyword
antineoplastic agent
adverse outcome
Article
cancer chemotherapy
cancer patient
chemotherapy
Cochrane Library
confidence interval
glioblastoma
human
incidence
intermethod comparison
Medline
meta analysis
overall survival
practice guideline
priority journal
progression free survival
qualitative analysis
quantitative analysis
Scopus
skin irritation
systematic review
brain tumor
chemoradiotherapy
electrotherapy
glioblastoma
procedures
Brain Neoplasms
Chemoradiotherapy
Electric Stimulation Therapy
Glioblastoma
Humans
Progression-Free Survival
Springer-Verlag Wien
Metadata display
Abstract
Background: We aim to review the available literature on patients suffering from glioblastoma treated with tumor-treating fields (TTFields) plus radio chemotherapy or conventional radio chemotherapy alone, to compare the efficacy and safety of the two methods. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Six studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 1806 patients for the qualitative analysis and 1769 for the quantitative analysis. Results: This study reveals increased median overall survival (weighted mean difference (WMD) 3.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.37, 4.21]; p < 0.00001), survival at 1 year (odds ratio (OR) 1.81 [95% CI 1.41, 2.32]; p < 0.00001) and 2 years (OR 2.33 [95% CI 1.73, 3.14]; p < 0.00001), and median progression-free survival (WMD 2.35 [95% CI 1.76, 2.93]; p < 0.00001) along with progression-free survival at 6 months (WMD 6.86 [95% CI 5.91, 7.81]; p < 0.00001) for the patients treated with TTFields. Survival at 3 years was comparable between the two groups. TTFields were associated with fewer adverse events compared to chemotherapy along with similar incidence of skin irritation. Conclusions: TTFields are a safe and efficient novel treatment modality. More randomized controlled studies, with longer follow-up, are necessary to further assess the clinical outcomes of TTFields. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/76075
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19735]
htmlmap 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister (MyDspace)
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContact Us
Choose LanguageAll of DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap