• English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • français 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Ouvrir une session
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de DSpace
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de DSpace
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Tout DSpace
  • Communautés & Collections
  • Par date de publication
  • Auteurs
  • Titres
  • Sujets

Monte Carlo dosimetric evaluation of high energy vs low energy photon beams in low density tissues

Thumbnail
Auteur
Tsiakalos, M. F.; Stathakis, S.; Plataniotis, G. A.; Kappas, C.; Theodorou, K.
Date
2006
DOI
10.1016/j.radonc.2006.02.012
Sujet
radiotherapy
heterogeneities
energy choice
18 MV PHOTONS
X-RAY-BEAM
ELECTRON-TRANSPORT
DOSE CALCULATIONS
AIR-CAVITY
LUNG
RADIOTHERAPY
CONVOLUTION
ALGORITHMS
LESIONS
Oncology
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Afficher la notice complète
Résumé
Background and purpose: Low megavoltage photon beams are often the treatment choice in radiotherapy when low density heterogeneities are involved, because higher energies show some undesirable dosimetric effects. This work is aimed at investigating the effects of different energy selection for low density tissues. Patients and methods: BEAMnrc was used to simulate simple treatment set-ups in a simple and a CT reconstructed lung phantom and an air-channel phantom. The dose distribution of 6, 15 and 20 MV photon beams was studied using single, AP/PA and three-field arrangements. Results: Our results showed no significant changes in the penumbra width in lung when a pair of opposed fields were used. The underdosage at the anterior/posterior tumor edge caused by the dose build-up at the lung-tumor interface reached 7% for a 5 X 5 cm AP/PA set-up. Shrinkage of the 90% isodose volume was noticed for the same set-up, which could be rectified by adding a lateral field. For the CT reconstructed phantom, the AP/PA set-up offered better tumor coverage when lower energies were used but for the three field set-up, higher energies resulted to better sparing of the lung tissue. For the air-channel set-up, adding an opposed field reduced the penumbra width. Using higher energies resulted in a 7% cold spot around the air-tissue interface for a 5 X 5 cm field. Conclusions: The choice of energy for treatment in the low density areas is not a straightforward decision but depends on a number of parameters such as the beam set-up and the dosimetric criteria. Updated calculation algorithms should be used in order to be confident for the choice of energy of treatment (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/33860
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19735]
htmlmap 

 

Parcourir

Tout DSpaceCommunautés & CollectionsPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsCette collectionPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujets

Mon compte

Ouvrir une sessionS'inscrire
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContactez-nous
Choose LanguageTout DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap