| dc.creator | Tsoucalas G., Bourelia S., Kalogirou V., Giatsiou S., Mavrogiannaki E., Gatos G., Galanos A., Repana O., Iliadou E., Antoniou A., Sgantzos M., Gatos K. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-31T10:17:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-31T10:17:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.2174/1567205012666150204122635 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 15672050 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11615/80109 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Floor effects are present in most dementia assessment tools as dementia progresses and the in–depth assessment of patients considered more or less on vegetative state is questionable. Objective: To develop a questionnaire (the “Gatos Clinical Test-GCT”) for the assessment of end-stage demented patients. Methods: Five hundred patients with dementia of various causes and an MMSE score between 0 and 2 were enrolled in the study. The GCT consists of 14 closed type questions rated on a Likert scale. The total score is used to evaluate patient’s dementia. Various aspects of validity and reliability (including face, content and structural validity as well as test-retest reliability) were examined. Results: Three subscales “Autonomy/Alertness”, “Gnosias” and “Somatokinetic function” were defined, with a Cronbach equal to 0.851, 0.756 and 0.598 respectively. The GCT subscales and total score were statistically significant higher in patients with MMSE score 1 or 2 compared with those with MMSE score 0 (p<0.0005). Patients with GCT total score less than 12.5 had 75% probability to have zero MMSE score. Conclusion: The “GATOS” questionnaire is a valid and reliable test for patients with severe dementia, aiming at identification of those patients who could sustain some quality of life. It is a relatively short and easy to administer tool. As dementia prevalence is expected to rise further worldwide we believe that GCT could offer valuable services to health professionals, caregivers and patients. © 2015 Bentham Science Publishers. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.source | Current Alzheimer Research | en |
| dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84952762462&doi=10.2174%2f1567205012666150204122635&partnerID=40&md5=35f9ff4206344bd5f27a9adbe05742f9 | |
| dc.subject | Article | en |
| dc.subject | criterion related validity | en |
| dc.subject | dementia | en |
| dc.subject | discriminant validity | en |
| dc.subject | female | en |
| dc.subject | human | en |
| dc.subject | interrater reliability | en |
| dc.subject | major clinical study | en |
| dc.subject | male | en |
| dc.subject | Mini Mental State Examination | en |
| dc.subject | prevalence | en |
| dc.subject | priority journal | en |
| dc.subject | quality of life | en |
| dc.subject | questionnaire | en |
| dc.subject | reliability | en |
| dc.subject | test retest reliability | en |
| dc.subject | validity | en |
| dc.subject | age | en |
| dc.subject | aged | en |
| dc.subject | dementia | en |
| dc.subject | educational status | en |
| dc.subject | employment | en |
| dc.subject | mental health | en |
| dc.subject | middle aged | en |
| dc.subject | procedures | en |
| dc.subject | reproducibility | en |
| dc.subject | rural population | en |
| dc.subject | terminal care | en |
| dc.subject | urban population | en |
| dc.subject | validation study | en |
| dc.subject | very elderly | en |
| dc.subject | Age Factors | en |
| dc.subject | Aged | en |
| dc.subject | Aged, 80 and over | en |
| dc.subject | Dementia | en |
| dc.subject | Educational Status | en |
| dc.subject | Employment | en |
| dc.subject | Female | en |
| dc.subject | Humans | en |
| dc.subject | Male | en |
| dc.subject | Mental Status Schedule | en |
| dc.subject | Middle Aged | en |
| dc.subject | Quality of Life | en |
| dc.subject | Reproducibility of Results | en |
| dc.subject | Rural Population | en |
| dc.subject | Surveys and Questionnaires | en |
| dc.subject | Terminal Care | en |
| dc.subject | Urban Population | en |
| dc.subject | Bentham Science Publishers B.V. | en |
| dc.title | End-stage dementia spark of life: Reliability and validity of the “GATOS” questionnaire | en |
| dc.type | journalArticle | en |