Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorTabadkani A., Roetzel A., Xian Li H., Tsangrassoulis A., Attia S.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T10:05:38Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T10:05:38Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116904
dc.identifier.issn03062619
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/79572
dc.description.abstractBuilding envelopes should be responsive to boundary conditions changing in short-time, daily, or seasonal patterns. To this end, adaptive facades provide the ability to react, or benefit from, outdoor fluctuations and dynamic indoor requirements. On the other hand, the parallel trend of developing new technologies to control their performance, make adaptive facades more applicable to counterbalance both user's comfort and building energy load. This goal can be met using active control mechanisms, either manually or automatically. Automatic shading controls require indoor/outdoor signal inputs to operate a shading system. However, in the literature, there is no consent on the effectiveness of automatic shading control strategies and all of the studies were investigated within specific environmental conditions. Therefore, this paper aims to compare the most used control functions and their implications on user comfort and energy load in different climate zones. To this end, EnergyPlus was used as a simulation platform to employ Energy Management System (EMS) for linking sensors, actuators to the control logic of adaptive venetian blinds. Then, a brute-force method was performed through Ladybug-tools to conduct 15,390 iterations parametrically. Results showed that climatic conditions impact the shading control scenario significantly, and the optimum scenario was an open-loop algorithm based on direct solar radiation due to the earlier activation of blind closure to block solar radiation while increasing lighting load at the same time. © 2021 Elsevier Ltden
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceApplied Energyen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85104915977&doi=10.1016%2fj.apenergy.2021.116904&partnerID=40&md5=e609102caf6cb940db28dcce4a348d83
dc.subjectAdaptive control systemsen
dc.subjectEnergy managementen
dc.subjectSimulation platformen
dc.subjectSolar radiationen
dc.subjectAdaptive facadeen
dc.subjectBuilding envelopesen
dc.subjectBuilding performance simulationsen
dc.subjectConditionen
dc.subjectEnergyen
dc.subjectManagement systemsen
dc.subjectOccupant comfortsen
dc.subjectShading controlen
dc.subjectUser comfortsen
dc.subjectUser interactionen
dc.subjectEnergy management systemsen
dc.subjectbasement (building)en
dc.subjectboundary conditionen
dc.subjectbuildingen
dc.subjectdetection methoden
dc.subjectenvironmental conditionsen
dc.subjectindoor airen
dc.subjectsensory systemen
dc.subjectsimulationen
dc.subjectsolar radiationen
dc.subjectElsevier Ltden
dc.titleAnalysis of the impact of automatic shading control scenarios on occupant's comfort and energy loaden
dc.typejournalArticleen


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem