Show simple item record

dc.creatorSpanos K., Nana P., Kouvelos G., Mpatzalexis K., Matsagkas M., Giannoukas A.D.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T10:00:40Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T10:00:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier10.1177/1526602819886568
dc.identifier.issn15266028
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/79291
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare different anatomical characteristics between intact and ruptured large abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA >80 mm) with the goal of refining the process of estimating rupture risk. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study involving 62 male patients with large (>80 mm) aneurysms matched for age and smoking produced a 31-patient elective group with a mean maximum aneurysm diameter of 92±9.7 mm and a 31-patient rAAA group (mean maximum aneurysm diameter 95.7±12 mm). Preoperative computed tomography angiography scans were analyzed with a dedicated workstation, and anatomical characteristics of the aortic neck, iliac arteries, and aneurysm were compared in multivariable regression analyses; the outcomes are given as the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The prognostic utility of several characteristics as predictors of rupture occurrence was examined with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Anatomical characteristics differing significantly between elective and ruptured aneurysms were the infrarenal aortic neck diameters at 5 mm, 10 mm and 15 mm; the neck length and calcification; the common iliac artery (CIA) lengths; the iliac artery indexes; the left CIA and external iliac artery diameters; and the total and true lumen aneurysm volumes. Intraluminal thrombus (ILT) volume did not differ (p=0.76), although its distribution in elective vs ruptured cases did [absent: 0% vs 19%, respectively (p=0.025); circumferential: 61% vs 35%, respectively (p=0.04)]. Total aneurysm volume was higher in rAAA (442±140 mL) vs intact AAA (331±143 mL, p=0.014), while the ILT/total aneurysm volume rate was lower in rAAA (55%) vs intact AAA (70%, p=0.02). Multivariate analysis determined that a shorter left CIA (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.1, p=0.016) and a smaller total aneurysm volume (OR 1.007, CI. 1.001 to 1.014, p=0.016) were associated with intact AAA. After a ROC curve analysis, left CIA length <50 mm demonstrated a lower incidence of rupture (sensitivity 60% and specificity 78%), while total aneurysm volume <380 mL had 60% sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: Large rAAAs seem to have different anatomical characteristics than similarly sized intact AAAs. Large intact AAAs have lower total aneurysm volumes and shorter left CIAs, with higher ILT/aneurysm volume rates. © The Author(s) 2019.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceJournal of Endovascular Therapyen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075204839&doi=10.1177%2f1526602819886568&partnerID=40&md5=f23ea2fa2db09e813a732d7166e0a5b3
dc.subjectabdominal aortic aneurysmen
dc.subjectageden
dc.subjectaneurysm diameteren
dc.subjectaneurysm ruptureen
dc.subjectaneurysm volumeen
dc.subjectaortic neck diameteren
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectcardiovascular parametersen
dc.subjectchronic obstructive lung diseaseen
dc.subjectcomputed tomographic angiographyen
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen
dc.subjectcoronary artery diseaseen
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitusen
dc.subjectdiagnostic test accuracy studyen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjecthyperlipidemiaen
dc.subjecthypertensionen
dc.subjectiliac arteryen
dc.subjectIntraluminal thrombusen
dc.subjectintrarater reliabilityen
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen
dc.subjectmaleen
dc.subjectmultivariate analysisen
dc.subjectperipheral occlusive artery diseaseen
dc.subjectpriority journalen
dc.subjectreceiver operating characteristicen
dc.subjectretrospective studyen
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificityen
dc.subjectsmokingen
dc.subjectthrombusen
dc.subjectabdominal aortaen
dc.subjectabdominal aortic aneurysmen
dc.subjectaortic ruptureen
dc.subjectaortographyen
dc.subjectcomparative studyen
dc.subjectcomplicationen
dc.subjectcomputed tomographic angiographyen
dc.subjectdiagnostic imagingen
dc.subjectpredictive valueen
dc.subjectrisk factoren
dc.subjectvery elderlyen
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen
dc.subjectAorta, Abdominalen
dc.subjectAortic Aneurysm, Abdominalen
dc.subjectAortic Ruptureen
dc.subjectAortographyen
dc.subjectComputed Tomography Angiographyen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectIliac Arteryen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Testsen
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subjectRisk Factorsen
dc.subjectSAGE Publications Inc.en
dc.titleAnatomical Differences Between Intact and Ruptured Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysmsen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record