Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorSingh B.B., Kostoulas P., Gill J.P.S., Dhand N.K.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T09:56:33Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T09:56:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier10.1371/journal.pntd.0006488
dc.identifier.issn19352727
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/79012
dc.description.abstractBackground: Brucellosis is endemic in the bovine population in India and causes a loss of US$ 3·4 billion to the livestock industry besides having a significant human health impact. Methods: We developed a stochastic simulation model to estimate the impact of three alternative vaccination strategies on the prevalence of Brucella infection in the bovine populations in India for the next two decades: (a) annual mass vaccination only for the replacement calves and (b) vaccination of both the adult and young population at the beginning of the program followed by an annual vaccination of the replacement calves and, (c) annual mass vaccination of replacements for a decade followed by a decade of a test and slaughter strategy. Findings: For all interventions, our results indicate that the prevalence of Brucella infection will drop below 2% in cattle and, below 3% in buffalo after 20 years of the implementation of a disease control program. For cattle, the Net Present Value (NPV) was found to be US $ 4·16 billion for intervention (a), US $ 8·31 billion for intervention (b) and, US $ 4·26 for intervention (c). For buffalo, the corresponding NPVs were US $ 8·77 billion, US $ 13·42 and, US $ 7·66, respectively. The benefit cost ratio (BCR) for the first, second and the third intervention for cattle were 7·98, 10·62 and, 3·16, respectively. Corresponding BCR estimates for buffalo were 17·81, 21·27 and, 3·79, respectively. Conclusion: These results suggest that all interventions will be cost-effective with the intervention (b), i.e. the vaccination of replacements with mass vaccination at the beginning of the program, being the most cost-effective choice. Further, sensitivity analysis revealed that all interventions will be cost-effective even at the 50% of the current prevalence estimates. The results advocate for the implementation of a disease control program for brucellosis in India. © 2018 Singh et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourcePLoS Neglected Tropical Diseasesen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85047901881&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pntd.0006488&partnerID=40&md5=e028e98a38f6a0678f3d7bbae47720a1
dc.subjectBrucella vaccineen
dc.subjectanimal experimenten
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectbacterial clearanceen
dc.subjectbrucellosisen
dc.subjectcost benefit analysisen
dc.subjectdisease controlen
dc.subjectfemaleen
dc.subjectinfection controlen
dc.subjectlivestocken
dc.subjectmaleen
dc.subjectmortality rateen
dc.subjectnonhumanen
dc.subjectprevalenceen
dc.subjectslaughterhouseen
dc.subjectvaccination coverageen
dc.subjectvaccine failureen
dc.subjectanimalen
dc.subjectbovineen
dc.subjectbrucellosisen
dc.subjectbuffaloen
dc.subjectcattle diseaseen
dc.subjectcost benefit analysisen
dc.subjecteconomicsen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectIndiaen
dc.subjectvaccinationen
dc.subjectveterinaryen
dc.subjectAnimalsen
dc.subjectBrucellosisen
dc.subjectBuffaloesen
dc.subjectCattleen
dc.subjectCattle Diseasesen
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectIndiaen
dc.subjectVaccinationen
dc.subjectPublic Library of Scienceen
dc.titleCost-benefit analysis of intervention policies for prevention and control of brucellosis in Indiaen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής