Logo
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • English 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   University of Thessaly Institutional Repository
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • View Item
  •   University of Thessaly Institutional Repository
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Institutional repository
All of DSpace
  • Communities & Collections
  • By Issue Date
  • Authors
  • Titles
  • Subjects

Built-in challenges within the supervisory architecture of the Eurozone

Thumbnail
Author
Philippas D., Dragomirescu-Gaina C., Leontitsis A., Papadamou S.
Date
2021
Language
en
DOI
10.1057/s41261-021-00183-z
Keyword
Palgrave Macmillan
Metadata display
Abstract
We analyse a sample of significant European financial intermediaries that fall under the Single Supervisory Mechanism, which is part of the existing institutional supervisory architecture of the Eurozone. Theory suggests that herding among financial intermediaries raises cross-sectional correlations and has negative implications for systemic risk. Empirically, herding behaviours are associated with clusters identifying commonalities in asset allocations and risk strategies. By adopting a novel clustering approach, we analyse whether some pre-determined classifications and criteria associated with the current supervisory framework can capture financial intermediaries’ herding behaviour. We find that simple classifications and criteria, which are less likely to be policy-biased, can be more efficient than complex ones when it comes to identifying commonalities posing the highest threats to systemic risk. The findings confirm the need for a macro- rather than micro-prudential approach to financial supervision by highlighting the importance of using a supervisory toolkit that includes indicators with a stronger cross-sectional and network dimension. Our methodology can serve as a final consistency check for quantitative-based classifications and criteria employed by supervisory authorities. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/78205
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19735]
htmlmap 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister (MyDspace)
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContact Us
Choose LanguageAll of DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap