Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.creatorPetró B., Papachatzopoulou A., Kiss R.M.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T09:49:53Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T09:49:53Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier10.1371/journal.pone.0185188
dc.identifier.issn19326203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/78129
dc.description.abstractBackground: Static balancing assessment is often complemented with dynamic balancing tasks. Numerous dynamic balancing assessment methods have been developed in recent decades with their corresponding balancing devices and tasks. Objective: The aim of this systematic literature review is to identify and categorize existing objective methods of standing dynamic balancing ability assessment with an emphasis on the balancing devices and tasks being used. Data Sources Three major scientific literature databases (Science Direct, Web of Science, PLoS ONE) and additional sources were used. Study selection: Studies had to use a dynamic balancing device and a task described in detail. Evaluation had to be based on objectively measureable parameters. Functional tests without instrumentation evaluated exclusively by a clinician were excluded. A total of 63 articles were included. Data extraction: The data extracted during full-text assessment were: author and date; the balancing device with the balancing task and the measured parameters; the health conditions, size, age and sex of participant groups; and follow-up measurements. Data synthesis: A variety of dynamic balancing assessment devices were identified and categorized as 1) Solid ground, 2) Balance board, 3) Rotating platform, 4) Horizontal translational platform, 5) Treadmill, 6) Computerized Dynamic Posturography, and 7) Other devices. The group discrimination ability of the methods was explored and the conclusions of the studies were briefly summarized. Limitations: Due to the wide scope of this search, it provides an overview of balancing devices and do not represent the state-of-the-art of any single method. Conclusions: The identified dynamic balancing assessment methods are offered as a catalogue of candidate methods to complement static assessments used in studies involving postural control. © 2017 Petró et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourcePLoS ONEen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85029837001&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0185188&partnerID=40&md5=a1427d669ba7a8429873b524865bfa6b
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectbalance boarden
dc.subjectbody equilibriumen
dc.subjectcomputerized dynamic posturographyen
dc.subjectdata extractionen
dc.subjectdata synthesisen
dc.subjectdynamic balancing assessmenten
dc.subjectdynamic balancing assessment deviceen
dc.subjectdynamic balancing tasken
dc.subjectexperimental testen
dc.subjectfunctional assessmenten
dc.subjectgeneral medical deviceen
dc.subjecthorizontal translational platformen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectrotating platformen
dc.subjectsolid grounden
dc.subjectstanding dynamic balancing abilityen
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen
dc.subjecttreadmillen
dc.subjectbody positionen
dc.subjectdevicesen
dc.subjectphysiologyen
dc.subjectEquipment and Suppliesen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectPostural Balanceen
dc.subjectPostureen
dc.subjectPublic Library of Scienceen
dc.titleDevices and tasks involved in the objective assessment of standing dynamic balancing – A systematic literature reviewen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

DateienGrößeFormatAnzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige