Logo
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Ελληνικά 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Σύνδεση
Προβολή τεκμηρίου 
  •   Ιδρυματικό Αποθετήριο Πανεπιστημίου Θεσσαλίας
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Προβολή τεκμηρίου
  •   Ιδρυματικό Αποθετήριο Πανεπιστημίου Θεσσαλίας
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Προβολή τεκμηρίου
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Ιδρυματικό Αποθετήριο Πανεπιστημίου Θεσσαλίας
Όλο το DSpace
  • Κοινότητες & Συλλογές
  • Ανά ημερομηνία δημοσίευσης
  • Συγγραφείς
  • Τίτλοι
  • Λέξεις κλειδιά

Underwater cultural heritage facing maritime spatial planning: Legislative and technical issues

Thumbnail
Συγγραφέας
Papageorgiou M.
Ημερομηνία
2018
Γλώσσα
en
DOI
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.08.032
Λέξη-κλειδί
Marine biology
Cultural heritages
Cultural origins
Economic values
Human activities
Place-based
Protection zones
Spatial planning
UNCLOS
Laws and legislation
coastal zone management
cultural heritage
economic analysis
environmental protection
human activity
international organization
legislative implementation
marine environment
planning legislation
regulatory approach
spatial planning
strategic approach
underwater environment
Elsevier Ltd
Εμφάνιση Μεταδεδομένων
Επιτομή
Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter UCH) constitutes an invaluable resource that has been poorly – if at all – addressed in most spatial planning attempts, due to the sectorial approach that has prevailed so far when planning in the sea. Lately however, that spatial planning in the marine space (MSP) is being re-launched under a place-based approach, the chances and challenges for UCH are considerably different. According to the existing international legislation (UNCLOS), coastal states can only interfere with UCH up to their Contiguous Zone (24 nm from the baseline), whilst beyond that limit UCH is left “abandoned” (unless “flag” or “cultural origin” states claim their protection). Of course, this “freezing” of jurisdictions beyond the CZ, means that for the greatest part of the oceans and seas, UCH protection totally depends on the wise regulation of all other human activities that affect directly or indirectly, cultural heritage. The paper argues that MSP under a place-based approach is a unique opportunity for better protection and wiser management of UCH in greater distances than ever, provided that coastal states proclaim their EEZ (in order to extend as much as possible the area within which they can practice MSP and therefore, tackle conflicts and encourage synergies with UCH). The paper proposes a five-step strategy for considering UCH in MSP. Step 1: Register and evaluate UCH sites and objects, Step 2: Identify ways to upgrade the economic value of UCH, Step 3: Select the most appropriate type of protection zoning, Step 4: Provide regulations and restrictions for activities within the UCH protection zone, Step 5: Ensure integration and cohesion of the planning adopted in the UCH buffer zones with the spatial/sea-use planning adopted in the wider marine area. The paper concludes by highlighting that beyond any strategy, the greater challenge and stake is how to compromise blue growth trend with UCH preservation and promotion. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/77682
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19735]
htmlmap 

 

Πλοήγηση

Όλο το DSpaceΚοινότητες & ΣυλλογέςΑνά ημερομηνία δημοσίευσηςΣυγγραφείςΤίτλοιΛέξεις κλειδιάΑυτή η συλλογήΑνά ημερομηνία δημοσίευσηςΣυγγραφείςΤίτλοιΛέξεις κλειδιά

Ο λογαριασμός μου

ΣύνδεσηΕγγραφή (MyDSpace)
Πληροφορίες-Επικοινωνία
ΑπόθεσηΣχετικά μεΒοήθειαΕπικοινωνήστε μαζί μας
Επιλογή ΓλώσσαςΌλο το DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap