| dc.creator | Panopoulos S., Chatzidionysiou K., Tektonidou M.G., Bournia V.K., Drosos A.A., Liossis S.-N.C., Dimitroulas T., Sakkas L., Boumpas D., Voulgari P.V., Daoussis D., Thomas K., Georgiopoulos G., Vosvotekas G., Garyfallos A., Sidiropoulos P., Bertsias G., Vassilopoulos D., Sfikakis P.P. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-31T09:41:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-31T09:41:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.1186/s13075-020-2140-3 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 14786354 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11615/77490 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: European data indicate that systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related death rates are increasing, thus raising concerns about SSc's optimal management. Herein, we describe current treatment modalities and drug survival in a real-life SSc cohort. Methods: Details on immunosuppressive/antiproliferative (methotrexate, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, rituximab, tocilizumab) and vasoactive agent [(endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), sildenafil, iloprost, and calcium channel blockers (CCB)] administration during the disease course (11.8 ± 8.4 years, mean + SD) of 497 consecutive patients examined between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively recorded. Drug survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Methotrexate was the most frequently administered immunosuppressive/antiproliferative agent (53% of patients), followed by cyclophosphamide (26%), mycophenolate (12%), and azathioprine (11%). Regarding vasoactive agents, CCB had been ever administered in 68%, ERAs in 38%, iloprost in 7%, and sildenafil in 7% of patients; 23% of patients with pulmonary fibrosis had never received immunosuppressive/antiproliferative agents, 33% of those with digital ulcers had never received ERAs, iloprost, or sildenafil, whereas 19% of all patients had never received either immunosuppressive/antiproliferative or other than CCB vasoactive agents. Survival rates of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate differed significantly, being 84/75%, 59/43%, and 74/63% at 12/24 months, respectively, with inefficacy being the most frequent discontinuation cause. Conversely, CCB, ERAs, and sildenafil had high and comparable retention rates of 97/91%, 88/86%, and 80/80%, respectively. Conclusions: Existing therapeutic limitations indicate that more evidence-based treatment is warranted for successful management of SSc. Vasculopathy seems to be managed more rigorously, but the low retention rates of immunosuppressive/antiproliferative drugs suggest that effective and targeted disease-modifying agents are warranted. © 2020 The Author(s). | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.source | Arthritis Research and Therapy | en |
| dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85082110763&doi=10.1186%2fs13075-020-2140-3&partnerID=40&md5=1eeb72a5753d31ca3f9752f0a5cee819 | |
| dc.subject | azathioprine | en |
| dc.subject | calcium channel blocking agent | en |
| dc.subject | cyclophosphamide | en |
| dc.subject | endothelin receptor antagonist | en |
| dc.subject | iloprost | en |
| dc.subject | methotrexate | en |
| dc.subject | mycophenolic acid | en |
| dc.subject | rituximab | en |
| dc.subject | sildenafil | en |
| dc.subject | tocilizumab | en |
| dc.subject | azathioprine | en |
| dc.subject | cyclophosphamide | en |
| dc.subject | drug | en |
| dc.subject | endothelin receptor antagonist | en |
| dc.subject | immunosuppressive agent | en |
| dc.subject | vasoconstrictor agent | en |
| dc.subject | adult | en |
| dc.subject | Article | en |
| dc.subject | clinical feature | en |
| dc.subject | cohort analysis | en |
| dc.subject | disease duration | en |
| dc.subject | drug efficacy | en |
| dc.subject | drug safety | en |
| dc.subject | drug withdrawal | en |
| dc.subject | female | en |
| dc.subject | finger ulcer | en |
| dc.subject | human | en |
| dc.subject | lung fibrosis | en |
| dc.subject | major clinical study | en |
| dc.subject | male | en |
| dc.subject | middle aged | en |
| dc.subject | retrospective study | en |
| dc.subject | survival rate | en |
| dc.subject | systemic sclerosis | en |
| dc.subject | treatment duration | en |
| dc.subject | unspecified side effect | en |
| dc.subject | aged | en |
| dc.subject | classification | en |
| dc.subject | systemic sclerosis | en |
| dc.subject | Adult | en |
| dc.subject | Aged | en |
| dc.subject | Azathioprine | en |
| dc.subject | Cohort Studies | en |
| dc.subject | Cyclophosphamide | en |
| dc.subject | Endothelin Receptor Antagonists | en |
| dc.subject | Female | en |
| dc.subject | Humans | en |
| dc.subject | Immunosuppressive Agents | en |
| dc.subject | Male | en |
| dc.subject | Middle Aged | en |
| dc.subject | Pharmaceutical Preparations | en |
| dc.subject | Retrospective Studies | en |
| dc.subject | Scleroderma, Systemic | en |
| dc.subject | Vasoconstrictor Agents | en |
| dc.subject | BioMed Central Ltd. | en |
| dc.title | Treatment modalities and drug survival in a systemic sclerosis real-life patient cohort | en |
| dc.type | journalArticle | en |