Logo
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • English 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   University of Thessaly Institutional Repository
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • View Item
  •   University of Thessaly Institutional Repository
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Institutional repository
All of DSpace
  • Communities & Collections
  • By Issue Date
  • Authors
  • Titles
  • Subjects

Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries

Thumbnail
Author
Morris N.B., Levi M., Morabito M., Messeri A., Ioannou L.G., Flouris A.D., Samoutis G., Pogačar T., Bogataj L.K., Piil J.F., Nybo L.
Date
2021
Language
en
DOI
10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049
Keyword
Article
climate change
decision making
employer
fatigue
feasibility study
heat stress
hydration
information dissemination
nanotechnology
occupational medicine
physiological stress
qualitative research
questionnaire
radiation exposure
solar radiation
task performance
training
Routledge
Metadata display
Abstract
Successful implementation of cooling strategies obviously depends on identifying effective interventions, but in industrial settings, it is equally important to consider feasibility and economic viability. Many cooling interventions are available, but the decision processes affecting adoption by end-users are not well elucidated. We therefore arranged two series of meetings with stakeholders to identify knowledge gaps, receive feedback on proposed cooling interventions, and discuss factors affecting implementation of heat-health interventions. This included four meetings attended by employers, employees, and health and safety officers (n = 41), and three meetings attended primarily by policy makers (n = 74), with feedback obtained via qualitative and quantitative questionnaires and focus group discussions. On a 10-point scale, both employers and employees valued worker safety (9.1 ± 1.8; mean±SD) and health (8.5 ± 1.9) as more important than protecting company profits (6.3 ± 2.3). Of the respondents, 41% were unaware of any cooling strategies at their company and of those who were aware, only 30% thought the interventions were effective. Following presentation of proposed interventions, the respondents rated “facilitated hydration”, “optimization of clothing/protective equipment”, and “rescheduling of work tasks” as the top-three preferred solutions. The main barriers for adopting cooling interventions were cost, feasibility, employer perceptions, and legislation. In conclusion, preventing negative health and safety effects was deemed to be more important than preventing productivity loss. Regardless of work sector or occupation, both health and wealth were emphasized as important parameters and considered as somewhat interrelated. However, a large fraction of the European worker force lacks information on effective measures to mitigate occupational heat stress. List of abbreviations: OH-Stress: Occupational heat stress; WBGT: Wet Bulb Globe Temperature. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/76747
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19735]
htmlmap 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister (MyDspace)
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContact Us
Choose LanguageAll of DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap