Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorLeenhardt R., Koulaouzidis A., Histace A., Baatrup G., Beg S., Bourreille A., de Lange T., Eliakim R., Iakovidis D., Dam Jensen M., Keuchel M., Margalit Yehuda R., McNamara D., Mascarenhas M., Spada C., Segui S., Smedsrud P., Toth E., Tontini G.E., Klang E., Dray X., Kopylov U.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T08:49:25Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T08:49:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier10.1177/17562848221132683
dc.identifier.issn1756283X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/75737
dc.description.abstractBackground: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly infiltrating multiple areas in medicine, with gastrointestinal endoscopy paving the way in both research and clinical applications. Multiple challenges associated with the incorporation of AI in endoscopy are being addressed in recent consensus documents. Objectives: In the current paper, we aimed to map future challenges and areas of research for the incorporation of AI in capsule endoscopy (CE) practice. Design: Modified three-round Delphi consensus online survey. Methods: The study design was based on a modified three-round Delphi consensus online survey distributed to a group of CE and AI experts. Round one aimed to map out key research statements and challenges for the implementation of AI in CE. All queries addressing the same questions were merged into a single issue. The second round aimed to rank all generated questions during round one and to identify the top-ranked statements with the highest total score. Finally, the third round aimed to redistribute and rescore the top-ranked statements. Results: Twenty-one (16 gastroenterologists and 5 data scientists) experts participated in the survey. In the first round, 48 statements divided into seven themes were generated. After scoring all statements and rescoring the top 12, the question of AI use for identification and grading of small bowel pathologies was scored the highest (mean score 9.15), correlation of AI and human expert reading-second (9.05), and real-life feasibility-third (9.0). Conclusion: In summary, our current study points out a roadmap for future challenges and research areas on our way to fully incorporating AI in CE reading. © The Author(s), 2022.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceTherapeutic Advances in Gastroenterologyen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85141792354&doi=10.1177%2f17562848221132683&partnerID=40&md5=7f23d953da933152130bd5e94b9abb5e
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen
dc.subjectcapsule endoscopyen
dc.subjectDelphi studyen
dc.subjectdrug developmenten
dc.subjectfeasibility studyen
dc.subjectgastroenterologisten
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectimplementation scienceen
dc.subjectpathologyen
dc.subjectquestionnaireen
dc.subjectsmall intestineen
dc.subjectSAGE Publications Ltden
dc.titleKey research questions for implementation of artificial intelligence in capsule endoscopyen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής