• English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Deutsch 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Einloggen
Dokumentanzeige 
  •   DSpace Startseite
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Dokumentanzeige
  •   DSpace Startseite
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Dokumentanzeige
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Gesamter Bestand
  • Bereiche & Sammlungen
  • Erscheinungsdatum
  • Autoren
  • Titeln
  • Schlagworten

A Performance Evaluation of Distributed Deep Learning Frameworks on CPU Clusters Using Image Classification Workloads

Thumbnail
Autor
Krisilias A., Provatas N., Koziris N., Konstantinou I.
Datum
2021
Language
en
DOI
10.1109/BigData52589.2021.9671461
Schlagwort
Deep learning
Image classification
Apache MXNet
Asynchronous learning
Distributed deep learning
Google tensorflow
Google+
Images classification
Learning frameworks
Performances evaluation
Pytorch
Synchronous learning
Benchmarking
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Zur Langanzeige
Zusammenfassung
Over the recent years, deep learning is widely being used in a variety of different fields and applications. The constant growth of data used to train complex models, has opened research in the distributed learning. In this domain, two main architectures are used to train models in a distribution fashion, all-reduce and parameter server. Both support synchronous learning, while parameter server also supports asynchronous learning. These architectures are adopted by tech companies, which have developed multiple systems for this purpose. Among the most popular and widely used distributed deep learning systems are Google TensorFlow, Facebook PyTorch and Apache MXNet. In this paper, we quantify the performance gap between these systems and present a detailed analysis to discuss the parameters that affect their execution time. Overall, in synchronous learning setups, TensorFlow is slower compared to PyTorch by average 2.65X, while the latter lags MXNet by average 1.38X. Regarding asynchronous learning, MXNet is faster by average 3.22X in respect with TensorFlow. © 2021 IEEE.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/75519
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19735]

Verwandte Dokumente

Anzeige der Dokumente mit ähnlichem Titel, Autor, Urheber und Thema.

  • Thumbnail

    Εξυπνοι και αλληλεπιδρώμενοι πράκτορες e-learning, smartive e-learning agents - smart and interactive e-learning agents 

    Μόσχος, Λάκης (2011)
  • Thumbnail

    Μηχανική και ενισχυτική μάθηση μέσω του αλγορίθμου Q-learning 

    Μπάτσιος, Ιωάννης (2021)
  • Thumbnail

    Motivating Engineer Students in E-learning Courses with Problem Based Learning and Self-Regulated Learning on the apT2CLE4‘Research Methods’ Environment 

    Paraskeva F., Alexiou A., Bouta H., Mysirlaki S., Sotiropoulos D.J., Souki A.-M. (2019)
    More and more university programs try to establish an understanding of research methodology with relevant courses at undergraduate schools. Engineer students should have adequate academic training and experience to gain ...
htmlmap 

 

Stöbern

Gesamter BestandBereiche & SammlungenErscheinungsdatumAutorenTitelnSchlagwortenDiese SammlungErscheinungsdatumAutorenTitelnSchlagworten

Mein Benutzerkonto

EinloggenRegistrieren
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpKontakt
Choose LanguageGesamter Bestand
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap