Mostra i principali dati dell'item
Assessment of the reporting quality of double-blind RCTs for ischemic stroke based on the CONSORT statement
dc.creator | Kodounis M., Liampas I.N., Constantinidis T.S., Siokas V., Mentis A.-F.A., Aloizou A.-M., Xiromerisiou G., Zintzaras E., Hadjigeorgiou G.M., Dardiotis E. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-31T08:43:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-31T08:43:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116938 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022510X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11615/74928 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background-Purpose: It is critical that Randomized Controlled Trials(RCTs) present complete and transparent reporting. The present study aims to determine the reporting quality of double-blind RCTs for medicinal interventions in patients with ischemic stroke, based on the 2010 CONSORT-statement. Methodology: MEDLINE was comprehensively searched. The CONSORT period was demarcated between 2000 and 2019, while compliance ≥75 was defined as good-adequate. Possible determinants were univariately and multivariately examined for associations. Results: Overall, 197 articles were considered eligible, 143 published after and 54 before 2000. CONSORT compliance was 68.11% ± 11.56% (standard deviation) and 55.65% ± 11.57% respectively. Among retrieved articles 56/143(39.16%) and 1/54(1.85%) were rated as of good reporting quality correspondingly [p < .001, OR = 34.115, 95%CI = (4.586, 253.762)]. McNemar's test was indicative of consistency regarding the adequately/inadequately reported items before and after the 2010 CONSORT-revision (p = 1.00). Univariate analysis revealed two significant associations with the reporting quality: high impact factor(IF) [high vs. moderate; p = .007, OR = 3.521, 95%CI = (1.396, 8.879), high vs. low; p < .001, OR = 7.583, 95%CI = (3.063, 18.762), moderate vs. low; p = .078, OR = 2.154, 95%CI = (0.911, 5.093)] and sample size [p < .001, OR = 4.297, 95%CI = (2.081, 8.874)]. Publication period (p = .742) and funding (p = .280) were not significantly associated. Multivariate analysis attenuated the impact of sample size providing insignificant results, whereas the effect of high IF remained significant [moderate vs. high; p = .029, OR = 0.337, 95%CI = (0.127, 0.895), low vs. high; p = .012, OR = 0.199, 95%CI = (0.057, 0.699)]. An exploratory analysis demonstrated significant, weak to moderate, positive linear correlation between reporting quality and IF [Pearson's r = 0.418, p < .001]. Conclusions: Adherence to the CONSORT-statement needs to be further endorsed and incorporated in every journal's instructions-to-authors. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.source | Journal of the Neurological Sciences | en |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085566315&doi=10.1016%2fj.jns.2020.116938&partnerID=40&md5=64dfbb84111601df7bd4a3c2d7935749 | |
dc.subject | Article | en |
dc.subject | brain ischemia | en |
dc.subject | clinical assessment | en |
dc.subject | funding | en |
dc.subject | human | en |
dc.subject | McNemar test | en |
dc.subject | multivariate analysis | en |
dc.subject | outcome assessment | en |
dc.subject | priority journal | en |
dc.subject | protocol compliance | en |
dc.subject | quality control | en |
dc.subject | randomized controlled trial (topic) | en |
dc.subject | sample size | en |
dc.subject | systematic review | en |
dc.subject | brain ischemia | en |
dc.subject | cerebrovascular accident | en |
dc.subject | complication | en |
dc.subject | controlled study | en |
dc.subject | double blind procedure | en |
dc.subject | randomized controlled trial | en |
dc.subject | research | en |
dc.subject | Brain Ischemia | en |
dc.subject | Double-Blind Method | en |
dc.subject | Humans | en |
dc.subject | Ischemic Stroke | en |
dc.subject | Research Report | en |
dc.subject | Stroke | en |
dc.subject | Elsevier B.V. | en |
dc.title | Assessment of the reporting quality of double-blind RCTs for ischemic stroke based on the CONSORT statement | en |
dc.type | journalArticle | en |
Files in questo item
Files | Dimensione | Formato | Mostra |
---|---|---|---|
Nessun files in questo item. |