Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorIoannou L.G., Mantzios K., Tsoutsoubi L., Notley S.R., Dinas P.C., Brearley M., Epstein Y., Havenith G., Sawka M.N., Bröde P., Mekjavic I.B., Kenny G.P., Bernard T.E., Nybo L., Flouris A.D.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T08:28:34Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T08:28:34Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier10.1080/23328940.2022.2037376
dc.identifier.issn23328940
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/74046
dc.description.abstractIn a series of three companion papers published in this Journal, we identify and validate the available thermal stress indicators (TSIs). In this first paper of the series, we conducted a systematic review (registration: INPLASY202090088) to identify all TSIs and provide reliable information regarding their use (funded by EU Horizon 2020; HEAT-SHIELD). Eight databases (PubMed, Agricultural and Environmental Science Collection, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Russian Science Citation Index, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar) were searched from database inception to 15 April 2020. No restrictions on language or study design were applied. Of the 879 publications identified, 232 records were considered for further analysis. This search identified 340 instruments and indicators developed between 200 BC and 2019 AD. Of these, 153 are nomograms, instruments, and/or require detailed non-meteorological information, while 187 can be mathematically calculated utilizing only meteorological data. Of these meteorology-based TSIs, 127 were developed for people who are physically active, and 61 of those are eligible for use in occupational settings. Information regarding the equation, operating range, interpretation categories, required input data, as well as a free software to calculate all 187 meteorology-based TSIs is provided. The information presented in this systematic review should be adopted by those interested in performing on-site monitoring and/or big data analytics for climate services to ensure appropriate use of the meteorology-based TSIs. Studies two and three in this series of companion papers present guidance on the application and validation of these TSIs, to guide end users of these indicators for more effective use. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceTemperatureen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85135267683&doi=10.1080%2f23328940.2022.2037376&partnerID=40&md5=7ebaa76cc0556aa68168f4d7537ea069
dc.subjectair temperatureen
dc.subjectalgorithmen
dc.subjectbehavior changeen
dc.subjectclimateen
dc.subjectdata analysisen
dc.subjectdata extractionen
dc.subjectenvironmental parametersen
dc.subjectheaten
dc.subjectheat stressen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjecthumidityen
dc.subjectmeta analysisen
dc.subjectmeteorologyen
dc.subjectmethodologyen
dc.subjectnomogramen
dc.subjectphysiological stressen
dc.subjectPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysesen
dc.subjectquality controlen
dc.subjectreliabilityen
dc.subjectReviewen
dc.subjectrisk assessmenten
dc.subjectsensitivity analysisen
dc.subjectsoftwareen
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen
dc.subjecttemperature stressen
dc.subjectvalidityen
dc.subjectwork environmenten
dc.subjectTaylor and Francis Ltd.en
dc.titleIndicators to assess physiological heat strain–Part 1: Systematic reviewen
dc.typeotheren


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής