Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorDe Pauw K., Roelands B., Van Cutsem J., Decroix L., Valente A., Taehee K., Letta R.B., II, Carrillo A.E., Meeusen R.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T07:52:14Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T07:52:14Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier10.1123/ijspp.2016-0598
dc.identifier.issn15550265
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/73148
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Nasal spray (NAS) containing caffeine (CAF) or glucose (GLUC) activates sensory(motor) cortices. Purpose: To investigate the influence of CAF or GLUC NAS on exercise and cognitive performance. Methods: Eleven male subjects (age 22 ± 2 y) performed a maximal cycle test and 2 familiarization and 3 experimental trials. Each trial included a 30-s Wingate test and a 30-min time-Trial (TT) performance test interspersed by 15 min of rest. Before and after each exercise test a Stroop task was conducted. Placebo NAS with or without CAF or GLUC was provided before each exercise session and at each completed 25% of the TT. Exercise-performance, physiological, and cognitive measures were obtained. Magnitude-based inferences determined the likelihood that NAS solutions would be beneficial, trivial, or negative to exercise-performance measures based on the smallest worthwhile effect. Physiological and cognitive measures were analyzed using (non)parametric tests (P < .05). Results: GLUC NAS substantially increased the average power output during the TT (very likely beneficial: 98%). No further worthwhile exercise-performance enhancements were found for both substances. In addition, no significant differences in physiological and cognitive measures were observed. In line with mouth rinsing, GLUC was shown to substantially enhance endurance performance, probably due to the activation of the olfactory pathway and/or extra-oral sweet-Taste receptors. Conclusion: GLUC NAS enhances endurance performance, which indicates a novel administration route. The higher activity in sensory brain cortices probably elicited the ergogenic effect. However, no further physiological and cognitive changes occurred, indicating that higher doses of substrates might be required. © 2017 Human Kinetics, Inc.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performanceen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040240082&doi=10.1123%2fijspp.2016-0598&partnerID=40&md5=6417f1269f8360fb2ddc407c1efbbb96
dc.subjectcaffeineen
dc.subjectglucoseen
dc.subjectnose sprayen
dc.subjectperformance enhancing substanceen
dc.subjectathletic performanceen
dc.subjectcognitionen
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen
dc.subjectdouble blind procedureen
dc.subjectdrug effectsen
dc.subjectexercise testen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectmaleen
dc.subjectphysiologyen
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen
dc.subjectStroop testen
dc.subjectyoung adulten
dc.subjectAthletic Performanceen
dc.subjectCaffeineen
dc.subjectCognitionen
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Methoden
dc.subjectExercise Testen
dc.subjectGlucoseen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectNasal Spraysen
dc.subjectPerformance-Enhancing Substancesen
dc.subjectStroop Testen
dc.subjectYoung Adulten
dc.subjectHuman Kinetics Publishers Inc.en
dc.titleDo glucose and caffeine nasal sprays influence exercise or cognitive performance?en
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής