Logo
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • English 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   University of Thessaly Institutional Repository
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • View Item
  •   University of Thessaly Institutional Repository
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Institutional repository
All of DSpace
  • Communities & Collections
  • By Issue Date
  • Authors
  • Titles
  • Subjects

Management of the pine processionary moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae), in urban and suburban areas: Trials with trunk barrier and adhesive barrier trap devices

Thumbnail
Author
Colacci M., Kavallieratos N.G., Athanassiou C.G., Boukouvala M.C., Rumbos C.I., Kontodimas D.C., Pardo D., Sancho J., Benavent-Fernández E., Gálvez-Settier S., Sciarretta A., Trematerra P.
Date
2018
Language
en
DOI
10.1093/jee/tox270
Keyword
adhesive agent
animal
city
comparative study
Greece
growth, development and aging
insect control
Italy
larva
male
moth
procedures
Spain
tree
Adhesives
Animals
Cities
Greece
Insect Control
Italy
Larva
Male
Moths
Spain
Trees
Oxford University Press
Metadata display
Abstract
In urban and suburban areas larvae of the pine processionary moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis and Schiffermüller), cause serious defoliation to Cedrus, Pinus, and Pseudotsuga trees and health problems to humans and domestic or farm animals by their urticating setae. In this study, we present the results of biennial trials (2015-2016) on the management of T. pityocampa infestations using commercial or LIFE-PISA prototype trunk barrier and adhesive trap devices in Greece (Attica and Volos), Spain (Valencia), and Italy (Molise). In Attica, for both 2015 and 2016, the commercial trunk barrier trap devices captured significantly more T. pityocampa wintering migrant larvae compared to the adhesive barrier trap devices, indicating their high capture capacity. The total performance of the trunk barriers trap devices was 99.8% in 2015 and 99.6% in 2016. In Volos and Valencia, no significant differences were recorded between captures in commercial and LIFE-PISA prototype trunk barrier trap devices. In the tests that were conducted in Molise, the commercial trunk barrier trap devices exhibited high effectiveness in capturing the wintering migrant larvae during their procession, before they reach the ground for pupation. Moreover, significantly fewer male adults were captured by pheromone trap devices during summer 2016 in comparison with 2015 in the experimental area. Similarly, significantly fewer nests were formed on the experimental area trees in winter 2016 and 2017 compared with 2015. Our results show the potential of the trunk barrier trap devices in the management of T. pityocampa numbers after long-term application in urban and suburban areas. © The Author(s) 2017.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/72937
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19735]
htmlmap 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister (MyDspace)
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContact Us
Choose LanguageAll of DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap