Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorChalkias A., Mongardon N., Boboshko V., Cerny V., Constant A.-L., De Roux Q., Finco G., Fumagalli F., Gkamprela E., Legriel S., Lomivorotov V., Magliocca A., Makaronis P., Mamais I., Mani I., Mavridis T., Mura P., Ristagno G., Sardo S., Papagiannakis N., Xanthos T., Mongardon N., Boboshko V., Cerny V., Constant A.-L., De Roux Q., Finco G., Fumagalli F., Gkamprela E., Legriel S., Magliocca A., Makaronis P., Mamais I., Mani I., Mavridis T., Mura P., for the PERIOPCA Consortiumen
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T07:42:40Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T07:42:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier10.1186/s13054-021-03695-2
dc.identifier.issn13648535
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/72444
dc.description.abstractBackground: Perioperative cardiac arrest is a rare complication with an incidence of around 1 in 1400 cases, but it carries a high burden of mortality reaching up to 70% at 30 days. Despite its specificities, guidelines for treatment of perioperative cardiac arrest are lacking. Gathering the available literature may improve quality of care and outcome of patients. Methods: The PERIOPCA Task Force identified major clinical questions about the management of perioperative cardiac arrest and framed them into the therapy population [P], intervention [I], comparator [C], and outcome [O] (PICO) format. Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published until September 2020 were performed. Consensus-based treatment recommendations were created using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of consensus among the Task Force members about the recommendations was assessed through a modified Delphi consensus process. Results: Twenty-two PICO questions were addressed, and the recommendations were validated in two Delphi rounds. A summary of evidence for each outcome is reported and accompanied by an overall assessment of the evidence to guide healthcare providers. Conclusions: The main limitations of our work lie in the scarcity of good quality evidence on this topic. Still, these recommendations provide a basis for decision making, as well as a guide for future research on perioperative cardiac arrest. © 2021, The Author(s).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceCritical Careen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85111664706&doi=10.1186%2fs13054-021-03695-2&partnerID=40&md5=93a6a85594a6d673b4a5ea0b3221f4ad
dc.subjectclinical practiceen
dc.subjectconsensus developmenten
dc.subjectdata analysisen
dc.subjectdecision makingen
dc.subjectDelphi studyen
dc.subjecthealth care personnelen
dc.subjectheart arresten
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectoutcome assessmenten
dc.subjectpatient careen
dc.subjectperioperative perioden
dc.subjectquality controlen
dc.subjectquestionnaireen
dc.subjectReviewen
dc.subjectstudy designen
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen
dc.subjecttreatment indicationen
dc.subjectvalidation processen
dc.subjectconsensusen
dc.subjectheart arresten
dc.subjectperioperative perioden
dc.subjectConsensusen
dc.subjectDelphi Techniqueen
dc.subjectHeart Arresten
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectPerioperative Perioden
dc.subjectBioMed Central Ltden
dc.titleClinical practice recommendations on the management of perioperative cardiac arrest: A report from the PERIOPCA Consortiumen
dc.typeotheren


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής