dc.creator | Dray X., Iakovidis D., Houdeville C., Jover R., Diamantis D., Histace A., Koulaouzidis A. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-31T07:37:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-31T07:37:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1111/jgh.15341 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 08159319 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11615/71215 | |
dc.description.abstract | Neural network-based solutions are under development to alleviate physicians from the tedious task of small-bowel capsule endoscopy reviewing. Computer-assisted detection is a critical step, aiming to reduce reading times while maintaining accuracy. Weakly supervised solutions have shown promising results; however, video-level evaluations are scarce, and no prospective studies have been conducted yet. Automated characterization (in terms of diagnosis and pertinence) by supervised machine learning solutions is the next step. It relies on large, thoroughly labeled databases, for which preliminary “ground truth” definitions by experts are of tremendous importance. Other developments are under ways, to assist physicians in localizing anatomical landmarks and findings in the small bowel, in measuring lesions, and in rating bowel cleanliness. It is still questioned whether artificial intelligence will enter the market with proprietary, built-in or plug-in software, or with a universal cloud-based service, and how it will be accepted by physicians and patients. © 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.source | Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia) | en |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099376472&doi=10.1111%2fjgh.15341&partnerID=40&md5=0491279e1e0d2427ea7fa5f0162620b3 | |
dc.subject | anatomic landmark | en |
dc.subject | Article | en |
dc.subject | artificial intelligence | en |
dc.subject | automation | en |
dc.subject | blood | en |
dc.subject | capsule endoscopy | en |
dc.subject | data base | en |
dc.subject | erosion | en |
dc.subject | human | en |
dc.subject | intestine endoscopy | en |
dc.subject | medical expert | en |
dc.subject | physician | en |
dc.subject | prospective study | en |
dc.subject | small intestine | en |
dc.subject | supervised machine learning | en |
dc.subject | ulcer | en |
dc.subject | artificial intelligence | en |
dc.subject | capsule endoscopy | en |
dc.subject | enteropathy | en |
dc.subject | forecasting | en |
dc.subject | pathology | en |
dc.subject | procedures | en |
dc.subject | small intestine | en |
dc.subject | Artificial Intelligence | en |
dc.subject | Capsule Endoscopy | en |
dc.subject | Forecasting | en |
dc.subject | Humans | en |
dc.subject | Intestinal Diseases | en |
dc.subject | Intestine, Small | en |
dc.subject | John Wiley and Sons Inc | en |
dc.title | Artificial intelligence in small bowel capsule endoscopy - current status, challenges and future promise | en |
dc.type | journalArticle | en |