Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorAthanassiou C.G., Kavallieratos N.G., Pardo D., Sancho J., Colacci M., Boukouvala M.C., Nikolaidou A.J., Kondodimas D.C., Benavent-Fernández E., Gálvez-Settier S., Trematerra P.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T07:34:24Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T07:34:24Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier10.1093/jee/tox050
dc.identifier.issn00220493
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/70964
dc.description.abstractThe development of reliable monitoring techniques can offer valuable sources of knowledge on the control of Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis and Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae). Nevertheless, there is a knowledge gap on the simultaneous large-scale monitoring of T. pityocampa male adult population by using novel trap devices. Thus, the influence of type of trap device on the capture of male adults of T. pityocampa was evaluated in four areas with pine trees in southern Europe; two in Greece (Thessaly and Attica), one in Italy (Molise), and one in Spain (Valencia). Six different novel trap devices, i.e., Prototype 1, Prototype 2, Prototype 3, Prototype 4, Prototype 5, and Prototype 6, were tested during 2015 between July and November. In general, the male adult catches lasted longer in the two sites of Greece compared with Molise and Valencia. Hence, in Thessaly, captures started in early August and remained at high levels until late September. In Attica, captures started in mid-August and lasted until early November. In contrast, for both Molise and Valencia, most of the male adults were captured in August, while male adult catches were recorded until September. From the trap devices tested, Prototype 1 was found superior than the other devices, regardless of the area, with the exception of Valencia, where there were no differences in the overall captures among Prototype 1, Prototype 5, and Prototype 6. In most of the combinations tested, there was a positive and significant correlation among captures of T. pityocampa in pairs of different trap devices, indicating that most of them gave similar population fluctuations. Our results suggest that Prototype 1 should be selected for the monitoring of T. pityocampa male adult population. © The Authors 2017.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceJournal of Economic Entomologyen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019542248&doi=10.1093%2fjee%2ftox050&partnerID=40&md5=b033216979454a6f3647453951a2e9e3
dc.subjectsex pheromoneen
dc.subjectanimalen
dc.subjectbiological pest controlen
dc.subjectchemotaxisen
dc.subjectGreeceen
dc.subjectItalyen
dc.subjectmaleen
dc.subjectmothen
dc.subjectphysiologyen
dc.subjectSpainen
dc.subjectAnimalsen
dc.subjectChemotaxisen
dc.subjectGreeceen
dc.subjectItalyen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMothsen
dc.subjectPest Control, Biologicalen
dc.subjectSex Attractantsen
dc.subjectSpainen
dc.subjectOxford University Pressen
dc.titleEvaluation of pheromone trap devices for the capture of Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) in southern Europeen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής