• English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • français 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Ouvrir une session
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de DSpace
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de DSpace
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Tout DSpace
  • Communautés & Collections
  • Par date de publication
  • Auteurs
  • Titres
  • Sujets

Association between the GLUT1 gene polymorphism and the risk of diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis

Thumbnail
Auteur
Zintzaras, E.; Stefanidis, I.
Date
2005
DOI
10.1007/s10038-004-0224-6
Sujet
diabetic nephropathy
GLUT1
polymorphism
meta-analysis
diabetes
RAT MESANGIAL CELLS
STAGE RENAL-DISEASE
MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS
POPULATION STRATIFICATION
CUMULATIVE METAANALYSIS
LINKAGE ANALYSIS
PROSTATE-CANCER
SUSCEPTIBILITY
MELLITUS
TRIALS
Genetics & Heredity
Afficher la notice complète
Résumé
The association between diabetic nephropathy (DN) and the XbaI polymorphism in the GLUT1 gene has been investigated in several case-control studies. These studies rendered contradictory results: the allele XbalphaI(-) was shown either to be a risk factor or neutral, or even protective for the development of the disease. To shed some light on these inconclusive findings, a metaanalysis of all available studies relating the XbaI polymorphism to the risk of developing DN was conducted. Five out of six identified studies included Caucasian populations, and only one involved samples from an Asian population. Overall, the meta-analysis suggested large heterogeneity between studies ( P< 0.01, I(2) = 68%) and lack of association between allele Xb alpha I(-) and the risk of developing DN relative to allele XbaI(+): random effects odds ratio ( OR)= 1.26 [ 95% CI (0.93, 1.69)]. Excluding one study with the controls not in Hardy Weinberg equilibrium, the sensitivity analysis revealed that heterogeneity (P= 0.28, I(2) = 21%) could be explained, and then, there is an overall association: fixed effects OR = 1.34 [ 95% CI (1.13, 1.60)]. Then, significant ORs were also found on analysis of subgroups: for the Caucasian population, fixed effects OR = 1.29 [ 95% CI ( 1.08, 1.56)] and for the type 2 diabetic patients fixed effects OR = 1.69 [ 95% CI ( 1.09, 2.63)]. In type 1 diabetes, there is a moderate heterogeneity ( P= 0.19, I(2) = 41%) with fixed effects OR = 1.29 [ 95% CI (1.06, 1.56)] and random effects OR = 1.32 [ 95% CI (1.01, 1.71)]. There is a source of bias in the selected studies: large studies failed to show association while small studies claimed an association. Although there is evidence of association between GLUT1 and DN, the above findings reinforce the need for further and more rigorous association studies.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/34980
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19735]
htmlmap 

 

Parcourir

Tout DSpaceCommunautés & CollectionsPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsCette collectionPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujets

Mon compte

Ouvrir une sessionS'inscrire
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContactez-nous
Choose LanguageTout DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap