Pipe-soil interaction and pipeline performance under strike-slip fault movements

Abstract

The performance of pipelines subjected to permanent strike-slip fault movement is investigated by combining detailed numerical simulations and closed-form solutions. First a closed-form solution for the force-displacement relationship of a buried pipeline subjected to tension is presented for pipelines of finite and infinite lengths. Subsequently the solution is used in the form of nonlinear springs at the two ends of the pipeline in a refined finite element model, allowing an efficient nonlinear analysis of the pipe-soil system at large strike-slip fault movements. The analysis accounts for large strains, inelastic material behavior of the pipeline and the surrounding soil, as well as contact and friction conditions on the soil-pipe interface. The numerical models consider infinite and finite length of the pipeline corresponding to various angles beta between the pipeline axis and the normal to the fault plane. Using the proposed closed-form nonlinear force-displacement relationship for buried pipelines of finite and infinite length, axial strains are in excellent agreement with results obtained from detailed finite element models that employ beam elements and distributed springs along the pipeline length. Appropriate performance, criteria of the steel pipeline are adopted and monitored throughout the analysis. It is shown that the end conditions of the pipeline have a significant influence on pipeline performance. For a strike-slip fault normal to the pipeline axis, local buckling occurs at relatively small fault displacements. As the angle between the fault normal and the pipeline axis increases, local buckling can be avoided due to longitudinal stretching, but the pipeline may fail due to excessive axial tensile strains or cross sectional flattening. Finally a simplified analytical model introduced elsewhere, is enhanced to account for end effects and illustrates the formation of local buckling for relative small values of crossing angle. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.