dc.creator | Rabe, G. L. | en |
dc.creator | Wellmann, J. | en |
dc.creator | Bagos, P. | en |
dc.creator | Busch, M. A. | en |
dc.creator | Hense, H. W. | en |
dc.creator | Spies, C. | en |
dc.creator | Weiss-Gerlach, E. | en |
dc.creator | McCarthy, W. | en |
dc.creator | Arizaga, M. J. G. | en |
dc.creator | Neuner, B. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-23T10:46:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-11-23T10:46:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1093/ntr/nts212 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1462-2203 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11615/32549 | |
dc.description.abstract | Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of emergency departmentinitiated tobacco control (ETC). Literature search in 7 databases and gray literature sources. Point prevalence tobacco abstinence at 1-, 3-, 6-, and/or 12-month follow-up was abstracted from each study. The proportionate effect (relative risk) of ETC on tobacco abstinence was calculated separately for each study and follow-up time and pooled, at different follow-up times, by Mantel-Haenszel relative risks. The effects of ETC on combined point prevalence tobacco abstinence across all follow-up times were calculated using generalized linear mixed models. Seven studies with overall 1,986 participants were included. The strongest effect of ETC on point prevalence tobacco abstinence was found at 1 month: Relative risk (RR) 1.47 (3 studies) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.062.06), while the effect at 3, 6, and 12 months was RR 1.24 (6 studies) (95% CI: 0.931.65); 1.13 (5 studies) (95% CI: 0.861.49); and 1.25 (1 study) (95% CI: 0.911.72). The benefit on combined point prevalence tobacco abstinence was RR 1.33 (7 studies) (95% CI: 0.961.83), p .08; with RR 1.33 (95% CI: 0.921.92), p .10, for the 5 studies combining motivational interviewing and booster phone calls. ETC combining motivational interviewing and booster phone calls showed a trend toward increased episodically measured tobacco abstinence up to 12 months. More methodologically rigorous trials are needed to effectively evaluate the impact of ETC. | en |
dc.source | Nicotine & Tobacco Research | en |
dc.source.uri | <Go to ISI>://WOS:000315219400005 | |
dc.subject | SMOKING-CESSATION INTERVENTION | en |
dc.subject | CLINICAL PREVENTIVE SERVICES | en |
dc.subject | NICOTINE | en |
dc.subject | DEPENDENCE | en |
dc.subject | CHEST-PAIN | en |
dc.subject | CARE | en |
dc.subject | MEDICINE | en |
dc.subject | HEALTH | en |
dc.subject | MOTIVATION | en |
dc.subject | DIAGNOSIS | en |
dc.subject | DISEASE | en |
dc.subject | Substance Abuse | en |
dc.subject | Public, Environmental & Occupational Health | en |
dc.title | Efficacy of Emergency DepartmentInitiated Tobacco ControluSystematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials | en |
dc.type | journalArticle | en |