Show simple item record

dc.creatorMoraiti, C.en
dc.creatorValle, P.en
dc.creatorMaqdes, A.en
dc.creatorBoughebri, O.en
dc.creatorDib, C.en
dc.creatorGiakas, G.en
dc.creatorKany, J.en
dc.creatorElkholti, K.en
dc.creatorGarret, J.en
dc.creatorKatz, D.en
dc.creatorLeclere, F. M.en
dc.creatorValenti, P.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T10:39:50Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T10:39:50Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.020
dc.identifier.issn0749-8063
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/31107
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess rotator cuff rupture characteristics and evaluate healing and the functional outcome after arthroscopic repair in patients older than 70 years versus patients younger than 50 years. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, comparative study of 40 patients younger than 50 years (group A) and 40 patients older than 70 years (group B) treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients older than 70 years were operated on only if symptoms persisted after 6 months of conservative treatment, whereas patients younger than 50 years were operated on regardless of any persistent symptoms. Imaging consisted of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative ultrasound. Preoperative and postoperative function was evaluated with Constant and modified Constant scores. Patient satisfaction was also assessed. The evaluations were performed at least 1 year postoperatively. Results: No patient was lost to follow-up. The incidence of both supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears was greater in group B. Greater retraction in the frontal plane and greater fatty infiltration were observed in group B. The Constant score was significantly improved in both groups (51 +/- 12.32 preoperatively v 77.18 +/- 11.02 postoperatively in group A and 48.8 +/- 10.97 preoperatively v 74.6 +/- 12.02 postoperatively in group B, P<.05). The improvement was similar in both groups. The modified Constant score was also significantly improved in both groups (57.48 +/- 18.23 preoperatively v 81.35 +/- 19.75 postoperatively in group A and 63.09 +/- 14.96 preoperatively v 95.62 +/- 17.61 postoperatively in group B, P<.05). The improvement was greater for group B (P<.05). Partial rerupture of the rotator cuff occurred in 2 cases in group A and 5 cases in group B. Complete rerupture was observed in 2 patients in group B. In group A, 29 patients (72.5%) were very satisfied, 8 (20%) were satisfied, and 3 (7.5%) were less satisfied. In group B, 33 patients (82.5%) were very satisfied, 6 (15%) were satisfied, and only 1 (2.5%) was less satisfied. Conclusions: Rotator cuff tears are characterized by greater retraction in the frontal plane and greater fatty infiltration in patients older than 70 years compared with patients younger than 50 years. After arthroscopic repair, healing is greater for patients younger than 50 years. Functional gain is at least equal between the 2 groups. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.en
dc.sourceArthroscopy-the Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgeryen
dc.source.uri<Go to ISI>://WOS:000348506300006
dc.subjectISOLATED SUBSCAPULARIS TEARSen
dc.subjectFULL-THICKNESS TEARSen
dc.subjectSTRUCTURALen
dc.subjectINTEGRITYen
dc.subjectTENDONen
dc.subjectSUPRASPINATUSen
dc.subjectYOUNGERen
dc.subjectMUSCLEen
dc.subjectOLDERen
dc.subjectRECONSTRUCTIONen
dc.subjectRETRACTIONen
dc.subjectOrthopedicsen
dc.subjectSurgeryen
dc.titleComparison of Functional Gains After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Over 70 Years of Age Versus Patients Under 50 Years of Age: A Prospective Multicenter Studyen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record