• English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • español 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   DSpace Principal
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Ver ítem
  •   DSpace Principal
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Todo DSpace
  • Comunidades & Colecciones
  • Por fecha de publicación
  • Autores
  • Títulos
  • Materias

The effect of performance feedback on cardiorespiratory fitness field tests

Thumbnail
Autor
Metsios, G. S.; Flouris, A. D.; Koutedakis, Y.; Theodorakis, Y.
Fecha
2006
DOI
10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.027
Materia
field test
shuttle run test
square shuttle test
agreement
verbal
cues
SHUTTLE RUN TEST
Sport Sciences
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Resumen
We investigated the effects of performance feedback (PF) on predicting maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) using the 20 m Multistage Shuttle Run Test (MST) and 20 m Square Shuttle Test (SST). The agreement between these two field tests in relation to laboratory VO2max was also examined. Forty healthy mates (age: 21.5 +/- 2.3; BMI: 23.7 +/- 2.0) randomly performed four indirect VO2max tests; that is the MST and SST, as we[I. as a modified version of MST (MSTMD) and SST (SSTMD). During MST and SST subjects received PF with respect to both test stage and running pace. In contrast, MSTMD and SSTMD incorporated auditory feedback which solely emitted signals regulating the running pace. Participants also performed a laboratory VO2max treadmill test (TT). ANOVA demonstrated significant mean predicted VO2max decrements in both MSTMD (p < 0.001) and SSTMD (p < 0.05) compared to MST and SST, respectively. In predicting TTO2max, the '95% limits of agreement' analysis indicated errors equal to 3.6 +/- 9.6 and 1.4 +/- 10.3 ml kg(-1) min(-1) with coefficients of variation of +/- 10.0% and 10.9%, for MST and MSTMD, respectively. The corresponding '95% limits of agreement' values for SST and SSTMD were 0.1 +/- 5.0 and -1.1 +/- 6.1 ml kg(-1) min(-1) with coefficients of variation of +/- 5.4% and +/- 6.7%, respectively. It is concluded that the application Of PF leads to superior field testing performances. (c) 2006 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/30974
Colecciones
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19735]
htmlmap 

 

Listar

Todo DSpaceComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMaterias

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContacto
Choose LanguageTodo DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap