Mostra i principali dati dell'item

dc.creatorFountas, K. N.en
dc.creatorKapsalaki, E.en
dc.creatorHadjigeorgiou, G.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T10:26:41Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T10:26:41Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier10.3171/2010.5.focus10111
dc.identifier.issn1092-0684
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/27527
dc.description.abstractObject. The wide application of deep brain stimulation in the management of movement as well as other degenerative neurological and psychiatric disorders has renewed the interest in using deep brain stimulation in the management of medically intractable epilepsy. Various stimulation targets have been used with significantly varying results in aborting seizure activity. Electrical cerebellar stimulation (CS) has been used for more than 50 years in the management of epilepsy, with conflicting results. In the current study, the authors review the pertinent literature to outline the role of CS in the management of medically refractory epilepsy. Methods. The PubMed medical database was systematically searched for the following terms: "cerebellar," "epilepsy," "stimulation," and "treatment," and all their combinations. Case reports were excluded from this study. Results. The pertinent articles were categorized into 2 large groups: animal experimental and human clinical studies. Particular emphasis on the following aspects was given when reviewing the human clinical studies: their methodological characteristics, the number of participants, their seizure types, the implantation technique and its associated complications, the exact stimulation target, the stimulation technique, the seizure outcome, and the patients' psychological and social poststimulation status. Three clinical double-blind studies were found, with similar implantation surgical technique, stimulation target, and stimulation parameters, but quite contradictory results. Two of these studies failed to demonstrate any significant seizure reduction, whereas the third one showed a significant poststimulation decrease in seizure frequency. All possible factors responsible for these differences in the findings are analyzed in the present study. Conclusions. Cerebellar stimulation seems to remain a stimulation target worth exploring for defining its potential in the treatment of medically intractable epilepsy, although the data from the double-blind clinical studies that were performed failed to establish a clear benefit in regard to seizure frequency. A large-scale, double-blind clinical study is required for accurately defining the efficacy of CS in epilepsy treatment. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.5.FOCUS10111)en
dc.source.uri<Go to ISI>://WOS:000283802400009
dc.subjectcerebellumen
dc.subjectcomplicationen
dc.subjectepilepsyen
dc.subjectoutcomeen
dc.subjectmedically refractoryen
dc.subjectseizureen
dc.subjectcerebellar stimulationen
dc.subjectDEEP BRAIN-STIMULATIONen
dc.subjectELECTRICAL-STIMULATIONen
dc.subjectDOUBLE-BLINDen
dc.subjectPALEOCEREBELLAR STIMULATIONen
dc.subjectPENICILLIN EPILEPSYen
dc.subjectTHALAMIC NUCLEUSen
dc.subjectSEIZURESen
dc.subjectCATen
dc.subjectMONKEYSen
dc.subjectBURSTSen
dc.subjectClinical Neurologyen
dc.subjectSurgeryen
dc.titleCerebellar stimulation in the management of medically intractable epilepsy: a systematic and critical reviewen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Files in questo item

FilesDimensioneFormatoMostra

Nessun files in questo item.

Questo item appare nelle seguenti collezioni

Mostra i principali dati dell'item