Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorDilmanian, F. A.en
dc.creatorKalef-Ezra, J.en
dc.creatorPetersen, M. J.en
dc.creatorBozios, G.en
dc.creatorVosswinkel, J.en
dc.creatorGiron, F.en
dc.creatorRen, B.en
dc.creatorYakupov, R.en
dc.creatorAntonakopoulos, G.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T10:25:29Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T10:25:29Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00180-X
dc.identifier.issn15221865
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/27052
dc.description.abstractBackground: Parallel, thin (<100 μm) planes of synchrotron-generated X rays, have been shown to spare normal tissues and preferentially damage tumors in animal models. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of such microbeams directed unidirectionally on angioplasted rat carotid arteries. Methods and materials: Three groups of Sprague-Dawley rats were studied: (a) rats with normal, untreated arteries, (b) rats treated by balloon angioplasty, but not irradiated, and (c) rats treated with balloon angioplasty and exposed to single fraction, unidirectional, parallel, microbeams an hour after angioplasty. The microbeam array, 15 mm wide×7.6 mm high, consisting of 27-μm-wide beam slices, spaced 200 μm center-to-center laterally traversed the damaged artery. The in-depth in-beam dose was 150 Gy, the "valley" dose (dose midway between microbeams resulting mainly from X-ray scattering) was 4.5 Gy on average, and the "integrated" (averaged) dose was 26 Gy. Results: Microbeam irradiation, as given in the present study, was tolerated, but was insufficient to significantly suppress the neointimal hyperplasia. Discussion: The microbeam dose used is considered low. Dose escalation would be necessary to reach conclusive results regarding the X-ray microbeam efficacy to control restenosis. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en
dc.source.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-1242293086&partnerID=40&md5=da8cb72dcdc777306fb2025111185d89
dc.subjectAngioplastyen
dc.subjectExternal beam irradiationen
dc.subjectMicrobeam radiation therapyen
dc.subjectRestenosisen
dc.subjectVascular radiation effectsen
dc.subjectanimal experimenten
dc.subjectanimal tissueen
dc.subjectartery intima proliferationen
dc.subjectarticleen
dc.subjectnonhumanen
dc.subjectpercutaneous transluminal angioplastyen
dc.subjectpriority journalen
dc.subjectradiation doseen
dc.subjectradiation scatteringen
dc.subjectraten
dc.subjectsynchrotronen
dc.subjectX irradiationen
dc.subjectX rayen
dc.subjectAngioplasty, Balloonen
dc.subjectAnimalsen
dc.subjectCarotid Artery, Commonen
dc.subjectCarotid Stenosisen
dc.subjectDisease Models, Animalen
dc.subjectDose-Response Relationship, Radiationen
dc.subjectGraft Occlusion, Vascularen
dc.subjectHyperplasiaen
dc.subjectModels, Cardiovascularen
dc.subjectRatsen
dc.subjectRats, Sprague-Dawleyen
dc.subjectTunica Intimaen
dc.subjectX-Raysen
dc.titleCould X-ray microbeams inhibit angioplasty-induced restenosis in the rat carotid artery?en
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής