• English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • français 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Ouvrir une session
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de DSpace
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de DSpace
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Tout DSpace
  • Communautés & Collections
  • Par date de publication
  • Auteurs
  • Titres
  • Sujets

Headspace single-drop microextraction of common pesticide contaminants in honey-method development and comparison with other extraction methods

Thumbnail
Auteur
Amvrazi, E. G.; Martini, M. A.; Tsiropoulos, N. G.
Date
2012
DOI
10.1080/03067319.2011.585716
Sujet
head space single-drop microextraction
multivariate optimization
liquid phase extraction
honey
pesticide contaminants
sample
preparation
CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS-SPECTROMETRY
SOLID-PHASE MICROEXTRACTION
BAR
SORPTIVE EXTRACTION
GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY
LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY
ELECTRON-CAPTURE
RESIDUES
GC
SAMPLES
INSECTICIDES
Chemistry, Analytical
Environmental Sciences
Afficher la notice complète
Résumé
In the present study the main factors that may influence the headspace single-drop microextraction (HS-SDME) of common pesticide contaminants (diazinon, lindane, chlorpyrifos ethyl, p,p'-DDE, and endosulfan) that may occur in honey were determined and an analytical protocol was further developed by the use of a multivariate optimization. The HS-SDME analytical method developed and two more analytical protocols for the determination of pesticides in honey: (i) by direct SDME (D-SDME), and (ii) by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), were further validated for the determination of target analytes. The three methods were also applied in the same real honey samples and results were further discussed. By D-SDME, LODs ranged from 0.04 mu g kg(-1) for beta-endosulfan to 2.40 mg mu g kg(-1) for diazinon and repeatability expressed as %RSD from 3 for lindane to 15 for diazinon and chlorpyrifos methyl; by HS-SDME, LODs ranged from 0.07 mu g kg(-1) for p,p'-DDE to 12.54 mu g kg(-1) for chlorpyrifos methyl and repeatability expressed as % RSD from 11 for chlorpyrifos methyl to 19 for p,p'-DDE; by LLE, LODs ranged from 0.09 mu g kg(-1) for beta-endosulfan to 19.31 mu g kg(-1) for diazinon and repeatability expressed as % RSD from 6 for p,p'-DDE to 11 for lindane. For all target pesticides but p,p'-DDE that could not be recovered by D-SDME method tested. The proposed HS-SDME optimized in this study was shown to be the method of choice for the determination of diazinon in honey whereas the most favourable analytical characteristics from the comparative study performed were achieved by D-SDME.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/25505
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19735]
htmlmap 

 

Parcourir

Tout DSpaceCommunautés & CollectionsPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsCette collectionPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujets

Mon compte

Ouvrir une sessionS'inscrire
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContactez-nous
Choose LanguageTout DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap