Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorEfstathiadou, Z.en
dc.creatorKoukoulis, G.en
dc.creatorStakias, N.en
dc.creatorChalla, A.en
dc.creatorZintzaras, E.en
dc.creatorTsatsoulis, A.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T10:26:04Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T10:26:04Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.07.005
dc.identifier.issn0378-5122
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/27282
dc.description.abstractEstrogens play a significant role in bone physiology. Their action is mainly exerted through their receptors. Estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) plays a major role in bone homeostasis and there is evidence suggesting that estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) has also an effect on BMD. We investigated the possible effect of two ER beta gene polymorphisms on spinal bone mineral density (BMD) and metabolic bone markers in Greek women. Spine BMD as well as biochemical bone markers were measured in 147 healthy peri- and post-menopausal women [mean age (S.D.) 54 (7.9) years]. Genotyping was performed for two restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) of ER beta gene, Rsal in exon 5 and Alul in exon 8. For each polymorphism studied the cohort was divided into two groups: the '' wild-type '' group (RR and AA, respectively) and the '' carrier '' group including subjects with at least one allele with the restriction site (Rr&rr and Aa&aa, respectively). The distribution of Rsal genotypes was RR: 91.2% (n = 134). Rr: 8.2% (n = 12), and rr: 0.6% (n = 1) and of Alul genotypes AA: 36.7% (n = 54), Aa: 57.2% (n = 84), and aa: 6.1 % (n = 9). No linkage disequilibrium was found between the two polymorphic sites studied. Spine BMD did not differ significantly in the two groups of either polymorphism, after adjusting for age, weight, height, and years since menopause [mean BMD (S.D.) for RR 0.841 (0.17) g/cm(2) versus Rr&rr 0.798 (0.13) g/cm(2), p = 0.25, and mean BMD (S.D.) for AA 0.828 (0.16) g/cm(2) versus Aa&aa 0.848 (0.17) g/cm(2), p = 0.32]. No significant differences were noted We in metabolic bone markers except for a marginal difference of RR versus Rr/rr in urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio [median (IQR) 3.88 (6.04) mu mol/mmol in RR versus 8.2 (4.32) mu mol/mmol in Rr/rr, p = 0.05]. Furthermore, no interaction between the two polymorphisms on BMD was found. In conclusion, in a Greek female post-menopausal population, the two ER beta gene polymorphisms were not associated with BMD, or metabolic bone markers. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.source.uri<Go to ISI>://WOS:000236528200002
dc.subjectbone mineral densityen
dc.subjectestrogen receptoren
dc.subjectosteoporosisen
dc.subjectER betaen
dc.subjectpolymorphismen
dc.subjectVITAMIN-D-RECEPTORen
dc.subjectASSOCIATIONen
dc.subjectALPHAen
dc.subjectMETAANALYSISen
dc.subjectRISKen
dc.subjectMICEen
dc.subjectGeriatrics & Gerontologyen
dc.subjectObstetrics & Gynecologyen
dc.titleCorrelation of estrogen receptor beta gene polymorphisms with spinal bone mineral density in peri- and post-menopausal Greek womenen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem