Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorZiogas A., Xydias E., Kalantzi S., Papageorgouli D., Liasidi P.-N., Lamari I., Daponte A.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T11:38:39Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T11:38:39Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier10.1016/j.tjog.2022.06.002
dc.identifier.issn10284559
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/81008
dc.description.abstractEndometrial cancer is a common malignancy in women worldwide, with myometrial invasion (MI) being an important prognostic factor, usually assessed via imaging techniques. The aim of this review is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3D transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVUS), a relatively new imaging modality, to that of 2D transvaginal ultrasound (2D-TVUS) and MRI in the prediction of deep myometrial invasion. Relevant articles were sought on MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Wiley Online Library databases. Articles were included if they were primary studies comparing 3D-TVUS to 2D-TVUS and/or MRI in adult endometrial cancer patients, with histopathological confirmation of MI as a reference standard. Ultimately, 7 studies were included, with 714 participants, 242 with deep MI and a mean age of approximately 60 years. 3D-TVUS, 2D-TVUS, MRI and 3D-TVUS-MRI co-evaluation had a pooled sensitivity of 80.4%, 77.6%, 80.7% and 94.6% respectively and a specificity range of 82.8%, 81.6%, 87% and 69.1% respectively. Overall, no statistically significant differences were found in sensitivity and specificity among 3D-TVUS and the other methods, except for a significant increase in sensitivity (p = 0.038) when combined with MRI. This shows that 3D-TVUS is comparable to MRI as far as diagnostic accuracy is concerned, however remains cheaper, less time-consuming and more tolerable, while offering some advantages over 2D-TVUS as well. Therefore 3D-TVUS application in MI assessment seems promising, although more research is required to further assess this finding and ascertain 3D-TVUS's place in endometrial cancer MI assessment. © 2022en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceTaiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecologyen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85135539337&doi=10.1016%2fj.tjog.2022.06.002&partnerID=40&md5=40454db90d1ff114cccaef341f0f89d5
dc.subjectadulten
dc.subjectcancer patienten
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen
dc.subjectdiagnostic accuracyen
dc.subjectdiagnostic test accuracy studyen
dc.subjectendometrium carcinomaen
dc.subjectfemaleen
dc.subjecthistopathologyen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectintermethod comparisonen
dc.subjectMedlineen
dc.subjectmiddle ageden
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance imagingen
dc.subjectReviewen
dc.subjectScopusen
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificityen
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen
dc.subjectthree dimensional echographyen
dc.subjecttransvaginal echographyen
dc.subjecttumor invasionen
dc.subjecttwo-dimensional imagingen
dc.subjectWeb of Scienceen
dc.subjectdiagnostic imagingen
dc.subjectechographyen
dc.subjectendometrium tumoren
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance imagingen
dc.subjectpathologyen
dc.subjectproceduresen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectEndometrial Neoplasmsen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityen
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen
dc.subjectElsevier Ltden
dc.titleThe diagnostic accuracy of 3D ultrasound compared to 2D ultrasound and MRI in the assessment of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer patients: A systematic reviewen
dc.typeotheren


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem