Show simple item record

dc.creatorTsitsifli S., Kanakoudis V.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T10:16:25Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T10:16:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier10.3390/w14162504
dc.identifier.issn20734441
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/80053
dc.description.abstractDrinking water quality monitoring in real time is of utmost importance to ensure public health. Although water utilities, following the related legislative framework, monitor drinking water quality through samplings, the likelihood of detecting contaminants in consumers’ taps is low, depending on the scale of the monitoring programme. Additionally, even if the monitoring frequency is high, there is a time delay since sampling and analysis processes take some time. The selection of suitable locations for the installation of online water quality sensors is a hard task for a water utility due to the complexity of the water distribution system, the limitations of certain network junctions which are not easily accessible, and the computational burden involved. This topic has been extensively studied in recent years and sophisticated methods have been developed using optimization techniques. However, small water utilities do not have the means to implement such tools. This paper applies a methodology to identify the suitable junctions for the installation of online water quality sensors based on different objectives and under demand-driven conditions. This paper utilizes the hydraulic simulation model of a standard network to set up the water quality simulation model. A thorough analysis of various contamination scenarios takes place with different injection nodes and at different starting injection times for 24 h. The latter relates to the contaminant’s spread due to varying water demand. After a thorough analysis of 816 scenarios, a prioritized list of the most suitable nodes for the installation of the sensors is available for each optimization objective. Comparing the prioritized list of nodes achieved from each single or multi-objective function, the detection probability is almost the same. The analysis revealed that, due to varying water demand conditions, the ranking of the proposed nodes suitable for the installation of water quality monitoring sensors differs. Thus, varying hourly water demand should be part of analyses seeking to get reliable results. © 2022 by the authors.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceWater (Switzerland)en
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85137399134&doi=10.3390%2fw14162504&partnerID=40&md5=cc84292757a124afd1a5b4ea25a8550f
dc.subjectPotable wateren
dc.subjectQuality controlen
dc.subjectWater distribution systemsen
dc.subjectWater qualityen
dc.subjectWater supplyen
dc.subjectConditionen
dc.subjectDemand-drivenen
dc.subjectDrinking-water qualitiesen
dc.subjectOn-line sensoren
dc.subjectSimulation modelen
dc.subjectWater demanden
dc.subjectWater quality sensorsen
dc.subjectWater quality simulationen
dc.subjectWater quality simulation modelen
dc.subjectWater utilityen
dc.subjectInstallationen
dc.subjectidentification methoden
dc.subjectmonitoring systemen
dc.subjectsensoren
dc.subjectwater demanden
dc.subjectwater qualityen
dc.subjectwater supplyen
dc.subjectMDPIen
dc.titleIdentification of Suitable Locations in a Small Water Supply Network for the Placement of Water Quality Sensors Based on Different Criteria under Demand-Driven Conditionsen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record