Show simple item record

dc.creatorSyropoulou A., Vernadakis N., Papastergiou M., Kourtessis T.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T10:05:25Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T10:05:25Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103964
dc.identifier.issn08914222
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/79561
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) is the most widely used measure of self-esteem, the evidential basis to confirm the RSES factor validity and reliability in children with intellectual disabilities (ID) has not been previously addressed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the RSES into a sample consisting of primary school students with mild ID, bearing in mind the aspect of multidimensionality. In addition, gender differences were also investigated. Methods: The participants were 103 primary school students with mild ID aged 9–12 years old. Fifty-four (52.4 %) of the participants were boys and forty-nine were girls (47.6 %). Using the LISREL software, six different models of factor structure were estimated. The psychometric properties of the RSES, including internal consistency, content validity, convergent and discriminant validity as well as confirmatory factor analysis, were assessed. Results: The findings of this study provide some preliminary support to the robustness of the bifactor model, with a general self-esteem factor and two method effect factors that capture the direction of positive and negative item wording. Conclusions: Although it is inappropriate to conclude that the results will be extended to all other populations and cultures, it can be assumed that bifactor models, which specify method effects due to wording, fit better than strictly unidimensional or two factor models. © 2021 Elsevier Ltden
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceResearch in Developmental Disabilitiesen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85106310660&doi=10.1016%2fj.ridd.2021.103964&partnerID=40&md5=650f095087d5a8692f22b075da30b936
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectchilden
dc.subjectconfirmatory factor analysisen
dc.subjectcontent validityen
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen
dc.subjectconvergent validityen
dc.subjectdiscriminant validityen
dc.subjectelementary studenten
dc.subjectfemaleen
dc.subjectGreek (language)en
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectintellectual impairmenten
dc.subjectinternal consistencyen
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen
dc.subjectmaleen
dc.subjectpreliminary dataen
dc.subjectprimary schoolen
dc.subjectpsychometryen
dc.subjectRosenberg Self-Esteem Scaleen
dc.subjectschool childen
dc.subjectself esteemen
dc.subjectsex differenceen
dc.subjectpsychometryen
dc.subjectreproducibilityen
dc.subjectschoolen
dc.subjectself concepten
dc.subjectstudenten
dc.subjectChilden
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectIntellectual Disabilityen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectPsychometricsen
dc.subjectReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.subjectSchoolsen
dc.subjectSelf Concepten
dc.subjectStudentsen
dc.subjectElsevier Inc.en
dc.titlePsychometric evaluation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in primary school students with mild intellectual disability: First evidenceen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record