Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorPeñalvo J.L., Sagastume D., Mertens E., Uzhova I., Smith J., Wu J.H.Y., Bishop E., Onopa J., Shi P., Micha R., Mozaffarian D.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T09:46:59Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T09:46:59Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00140-7
dc.identifier.issn24682667
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/78036
dc.description.abstractBackground: The workplace offers a unique opportunity for effective health promotion. We aimed to comprehensively study the effectiveness of multicomponent worksite wellness programmes for improving diet and cardiometabolic risk factors. Methods: We did a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Education Resources Information Center, from Jan 1, 1990, to June 30, 2020, for studies with controlled evaluation designs that assessed multicomponent workplace wellness programmes. Investigators independently appraised the evidence and extracted the data. Outcomes were dietary factors, anthropometric measures, and cardiometabolic risk factors. Pooled effects were calculated by inverse-variance random-effects meta-analysis. Potential sources of heterogeneity and study biases were evaluated. Findings: From 10 169 abstracts reviewed, 121 studies (82 [68%] randomised controlled trials and 39 [32%] quasi-experimental interventions) met the eligibility criteria. Most studies were done in North America (57 [47%]), and Europe, Australia, or New Zealand (36 [30%]). The median number of participants was 413·0 (IQR 124·0–904·0), and median duration of intervention was 9·0 months (4·5–18·0). Workplace wellness programmes improved fruit and vegetable consumption (0·27 servings per day [95% CI 0·16 to 0·37]), fruit consumption (0·20 servings per day [0·11 to 0·28]), body-mass index (–0·22 kg/m2 [–0·28 to –0·17]), waist circumference (–1·47 cm [–1·96 to –0·98]), systolic blood pressure (–2·03 mm Hg [–3·16 to –0·89]), and LDL cholesterol (–5·18 mg/dL [–7·83 to –2·53]), and to a lesser extent improved total fat intake (–1·18% of daily energy intake [–1·78 to –0·58]), saturated fat intake (–0·70% of daily energy [–1·22 to –0·18]), bodyweight (–0·92 kg [–1·11 to –0·72]), diastolic blood pressure (–1·11 mm Hg [–1·78 to –0·44]), fasting blood glucose (–1·81 mg/dL [–3·33 to –0·28]), HDL cholesterol (1·11 mg/dL [0·48 to 1·74]), and triglycerides (–5·38 mg/dL [–9·18 to –1·59]). No significant benefits were observed for intake of vegetables (0·03 servings per day [95% CI –0·04 to 0·10]), fibre (0·26 g per day [–0·15 to 0·67]), polyunsaturated fat (–0·23% of daily energy [–0·59 to 0·13]), or for body fat (–0·80% [–1·80 to 0·21]), waist-to-hip ratio (–0·00 ratio [–0·01 to 0·00]), or lean mass (1·01 kg [–0·82 to 2·83]). Heterogeneity values ranged from 46·9% to 91·5%. Between-study differences in outcomes were not significantly explained by study design, location, population, or similar factors in heterogeneity analyses. Interpretation: Workplace wellness programmes are associated with improvements in specific dietary, anthropometric, and cardiometabolic risk indicators. The heterogeneity identified in study designs and results should be considered when using these programmes as strategies to improve cardiometabolic health. Funding: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceThe Lancet Public Healthen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85113493482&doi=10.1016%2fS2468-2667%2821%2900140-7&partnerID=40&md5=99b270ad27a6e21239c6f02f5d79b8e9
dc.subjecthigh density lipoprotein cholesterolen
dc.subjectinsulinen
dc.subjectlipiden
dc.subjectlow density lipoprotein cholesterolen
dc.subjectpolyunsaturated fatty aciden
dc.subjectsaturated fatty aciden
dc.subjecttriacylglycerolen
dc.subjectanthropometryen
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectblood pressureen
dc.subjectbody faten
dc.subjectbody fat percentageen
dc.subjectbody massen
dc.subjectbody weighten
dc.subjectbody weight lossen
dc.subjectcaloric intakeen
dc.subjectcardiometabolic risk factoren
dc.subjectcardiovascular risken
dc.subjectcholesterol blood levelen
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitusen
dc.subjectdiastolic blood pressureen
dc.subjectdietary intakeen
dc.subjectfat intakeen
dc.subjectfollow upen
dc.subjectfood frequency questionnaireen
dc.subjectFramingham risk scoreen
dc.subjectfruit consumptionen
dc.subjectglucose blood levelen
dc.subjecthealth care costen
dc.subjecthealth programen
dc.subjecthealth promotionen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectlean body weighten
dc.subjectmental healthen
dc.subjectmeta analysisen
dc.subjectobesityen
dc.subjectphysical activityen
dc.subjectquality of lifeen
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial (topic)en
dc.subjectrisk factoren
dc.subjectsmokingen
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen
dc.subjectsystolic blood pressureen
dc.subjectvegetable consumptionen
dc.subjectwaist circumferenceen
dc.subjectwaist hip ratioen
dc.subjectwellbeingen
dc.subjectworkplace wellness programmeen
dc.subjectfeeding behavioren
dc.subjecthealth promotionen
dc.subjectmetabolic syndrome Xen
dc.subjectobesityen
dc.subjectoccupational healthen
dc.subjectprogram evaluationen
dc.subjectpsychologyen
dc.subjectFeeding Behavioren
dc.subjectHealth Promotionen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMetabolic Syndromeen
dc.subjectOccupational Healthen
dc.subjectOverweighten
dc.subjectProgram Evaluationen
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicen
dc.subjectElsevier Ltden
dc.titleEffectiveness of workplace wellness programmes for dietary habits, overweight, and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem