Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorMitsogiannis I.C., Mitsogianni M., Bakalis V., de Paz A.T., Vlachostergios P.J., Tzortzis V.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T09:00:40Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T09:00:40Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier10.2147/RRU.S354925
dc.identifier.issn22532447
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/76686
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment has become an integral part of clinical research across different disciplines. However, the degree of incorporation of QoL standardized questionnaires in daily routine is variable. This survey study examined how HRQoL is perceived and utilized among urologists from the Hellenic Urological Association (HUA) in their daily practice. Methods: A nationwide survey of Greek urologists registered with the HUA was conducted. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire sent via email. The survey questionnaire consisted of demographic data including sex, age, working position and working environment and 11 Likert-scale questions regarding perception and use of HRQoL in clinical practice. Results: A total of 1000 Greek urologists were contacted, of whom 400 (40%) responded. Participants were predominantly male (94.8%) with a mean age of 43.7 years and a mean working experience of 12.5 years. Most participants considered HRQoL assessment to be important in their clinical practice (95.3%) and valuable in both patient consultation (95.8%) and treatment follow-up (91.8%). Half of urologists (51%) agreed with the statement that there is limited time for HRQoL assessment in daily practice. Validated questionnaires were rated as useful by 75.5% of participants. Overall, only 26.7% of participants stated they have incorporated HRQoL questionnaires in their daily practice. A subgroup analysis of participants showed that experienced physicians (>10 years) were less likely to utilize HRQoL (OR 0.38, p=0.008, 95% CI 0.19–0.77) and experienced difficulty in distinguishing between HRQoL assessment and symptom-rating (OR 0.32, p<0.001, 95% CI 0.17–0.61). Lack of time for HRQoL assessment was a main concern for urologists in-training (OR 0.7, p<0.001, 95% CI 0.57–0.85). Conclusion: HRQoL assessment is well-perceived by Greek urologists, although it has yet to achieve a substantial degree of integration in their daily practice. © 2022 Mitsogiannis et al.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceResearch and Reports in Urologyen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85128421441&doi=10.2147%2fRRU.S354925&partnerID=40&md5=a7de6fd78c67f2b604a358196a8e40d1
dc.subjectadulten
dc.subjectarticleen
dc.subjectclinical practiceen
dc.subjectconsultationen
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen
dc.subjectdemographicsen
dc.subjecte-mailen
dc.subjectfemaleen
dc.subjectfollow upen
dc.subjecthealth surveyen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectLikert scaleen
dc.subjectmaleen
dc.subjectperceptionen
dc.subjectphysicianen
dc.subjectquality of lifeen
dc.subjectquestionnaireen
dc.subjecturologisten
dc.subjectwork environmenten
dc.subjectDove Medical Press Ltden
dc.titleHealth-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Daily Urologic Practice: A Survey of Greek Urologistsen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής