Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.creatorMalahias M.-A., Chytas D., Nakamura K., Raoulis V., Yokota M., Nikolaou V.S.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T08:56:08Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T08:56:08Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier10.1186/s40798-018-0145-0
dc.identifier.issn21991170
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/76164
dc.description.abstractRecently, four different operative techniques, referring to the primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, were described. These are the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) with Ligamys™, the Bridge-enhanced repair (BEAR), the use of internal brace, and the refixation with suture anchors. The purpose of this study was to assess the already-published, clinical, and pre-clinical results of those techniques. A literature review was conducted and implemented by three independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were clinical or cadaveric or animal studies about patients suffering from ACL rupture, who were treated with one of those four different arthroscopic techniques of primary ACL repair. There were 10 clinical trials dealing with the different techniques of primary ACL repair and 12 cadaveric or animal studies. The majority of the published clinical trials investigated the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), while only four studies referred to the three other surgical techniques. Most of the clinical trials suggested that primary ACL repair should be done during the first 14–21 days after a proximal ACL rupture and not later. Further clinical evidence is needed for the techniques of bridge-enhanced ACL repair, internal brace, and suture anchors ACL refixation in order to support the animal and cadaveric biomechanical studies. Till now, the existing clinical trials were not enough to establish the use of those techniques in the ACL-ruptured patients. On the contrary, the Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization with Ligamys™ device demonstrated very promising results in different types of clinical studies. © 2018, The Author(s).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceSports Medicine - Openen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075510350&doi=10.1186%2fs40798-018-0145-0&partnerID=40&md5=f682eebe89135e3490648e6e505853f9
dc.subjectcollagenen
dc.subjectpolyethylene terephthalateen
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionen
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament ruptureen
dc.subjectarthrocentesisen
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen
dc.subjectbridge enhanced repairen
dc.subjectclinical outcomeen
dc.subjectclinical trial (topic)en
dc.subjectcomparative studyen
dc.subjectdynamic intraligamentary stabilizationen
dc.subjectfollow upen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectinflammationen
dc.subjectknee functionen
dc.subjectmicrofractureen
dc.subjectnonhumanen
dc.subjectosteosynthesisen
dc.subjectReviewen
dc.subjectsurgical techniqueen
dc.subjectsurvival rateen
dc.subjecttissue repairen
dc.subjecttotal skin electron therapyen
dc.subjectSpringeren
dc.titleA Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend?en
dc.typeotheren


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée