Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: A meta-analysis
dc.creator | Magouliotis D.E., Tasiopoulou V.S., Svokos A.A., Svokos K.A., Sioka E., Zacharoulis D. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-31T08:55:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-31T08:55:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1089/lap.2017.0245 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 10926429 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11615/76096 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The purpose of this study was to review the existing evidence on obese patients treated with single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILSG) or conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), to compare the perioperative parameters and outcomes of the two bariatric procedures. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria and incorporated 3843 patients. Results: This study reveals comparable mean operative time, length of hospital stay, and complications between the two approaches. The SILSG approach was associated with enhanced cosmetic results, but increased incisional hernia rate. Conclusions: These outcomes should be treated with caution given the small number of included comparative studies. Well-designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing LSG to SILSG, are necessary to assess further their clinical outcomes. © 2018 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.source | Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques | en |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048393623&doi=10.1089%2flap.2017.0245&partnerID=40&md5=caa217efeb5b8524a6c04e319d785b2f | |
dc.subject | Article | en |
dc.subject | bariatric surgery | en |
dc.subject | clinical outcome | en |
dc.subject | Cochrane Library | en |
dc.subject | comparative effectiveness | en |
dc.subject | controlled study | en |
dc.subject | gastroesophageal reflux | en |
dc.subject | human | en |
dc.subject | incisional hernia | en |
dc.subject | information retrieval | en |
dc.subject | laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy | en |
dc.subject | length of stay | en |
dc.subject | Medline | en |
dc.subject | meta analysis | en |
dc.subject | morbid obesity | en |
dc.subject | mortality | en |
dc.subject | operation duration | en |
dc.subject | postoperative complication | en |
dc.subject | priority journal | en |
dc.subject | reoperation | en |
dc.subject | Scopus | en |
dc.subject | single incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy | en |
dc.subject | systematic review | en |
dc.subject | wound infection | en |
dc.subject | adult | en |
dc.subject | bariatric surgery | en |
dc.subject | body weight loss | en |
dc.subject | female | en |
dc.subject | gastrectomy | en |
dc.subject | laparoscopy | en |
dc.subject | male | en |
dc.subject | middle aged | en |
dc.subject | morbid obesity | en |
dc.subject | procedures | en |
dc.subject | statistics and numerical data | en |
dc.subject | treatment outcome | en |
dc.subject | Adult | en |
dc.subject | Bariatric Surgery | en |
dc.subject | Female | en |
dc.subject | Gastrectomy | en |
dc.subject | Humans | en |
dc.subject | Laparoscopy | en |
dc.subject | Length of Stay | en |
dc.subject | Male | en |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | en |
dc.subject | Obesity, Morbid | en |
dc.subject | Operative Time | en |
dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | en |
dc.subject | Weight Loss | en |
dc.subject | Mary Ann Liebert Inc. | en |
dc.title | Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: A meta-analysis | en |
dc.type | journalArticle | en |
Ficheros en el ítem
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
---|---|---|---|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |