Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.creatorMagouliotis D.E., Tasiopoulou V.S., Sioka E., Zacharoulis D.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T08:55:47Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T08:55:47Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier10.1007/s11695-016-2444-1
dc.identifier.issn09608923
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/76093
dc.description.abstractWe aim to review the available literature on obese patients treated with robotic or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library and EBSCOhost databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 29,787 patients. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) technique showed significantly higher mean operative time and increased length of hospital stay. Post-operative incidence of leakage, wound infection and bleeding, along with weight reduction, were comparable. The majority of the studies assessing charges found increased cost in RSG population. Well-designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing RSG to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), are necessary to assess further their clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceObesity Surgeryen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84994318996&doi=10.1007%2fs11695-016-2444-1&partnerID=40&md5=dd5955fc6e4ec67c8a1ebb8d74203324
dc.subjectbody massen
dc.subjectbougieen
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.subjectclinical outcomeen
dc.subjectcomorbidityen
dc.subjectcost effectiveness analysisen
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitusen
dc.subjectdyslipidemiaen
dc.subjectendoscopeen
dc.subjectexcess weight lossen
dc.subjectGreeceen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjecthypertensionen
dc.subjectincidenceen
dc.subjectIndiaen
dc.subjectlaparoscopic surgeryen
dc.subjectlength of stayen
dc.subjectmeta analysisen
dc.subjectmorbid obesityen
dc.subjectoperation durationen
dc.subjectpostoperative complicationen
dc.subjectpostoperative hemorrhageen
dc.subjectpriority journalen
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial (topic)en
dc.subjectReviewen
dc.subjectrobot assisted surgeryen
dc.subjectsleep disordered breathingen
dc.subjectsleeve gastrectomyen
dc.subjectSpainen
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen
dc.subjectUnited Statesen
dc.subjectweight reductionen
dc.subjectwound infectionen
dc.subjectcomparative studyen
dc.subjectcost benefit analysisen
dc.subjecteconomicsen
dc.subjectgastrectomyen
dc.subjectlaparoscopyen
dc.subjectObesity, Morbiden
dc.subjectpostoperative perioden
dc.subjectproceduresen
dc.subjectrobotic surgical procedureen
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen
dc.subjectGastrectomyen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen
dc.subjectLength of Stayen
dc.subjectObesity, Morbiden
dc.subjectOperative Timeen
dc.subjectPostoperative Perioden
dc.subjectRobotic Surgical Proceduresen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectWeight Lossen
dc.subjectSpringer New York LLCen
dc.titleRobotic versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysisen
dc.typeotheren


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

DateienGrößeFormatAnzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige