Show simple item record

dc.creatorHutchinson P.J., Kolias A.G., Tajsic T., Adeleye A., Aklilu A.T., Apriawan T., Bajamal A.H., Barthélemy E.J., Devi B.I., Bhat D., Bulters D., Chesnut R., Citerio G., Cooper D.J., Czosnyka M., Edem I., El-Ghandour N.M.F., Figaji A., Fountas K.N., Gallagher C., Hawryluk G.W.J., Iaccarino C., Joseph M., Khan T., Laeke T., Levchenko O., Liu B., Liu W., Maas A., Manley G.T., Manson P., Mazzeo A.T., Menon D.K., Michael D.B., Muehlschlegel S., Okonkwo D.O., Park K.B., Rosenfeld J.V., Rosseau G., Rubiano A.M., Shabani H.K., Stocchetti N., Timmons S.D., Timofeev I., Uff C., Ullman J.S., Valadka A., Waran V., Wells A., Wilson M.H., Servadei F.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T08:28:14Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T08:28:14Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier10.1007/s00701-019-03936-y
dc.identifier.issn00016268
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/73981
dc.description.abstractBackground: Two randomised trials assessing the effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy (DC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) were published in recent years: DECRA in 2011 and RESCUEicp in 2016. As the results have generated debate amongst clinicians and researchers working in the field of TBI worldwide, it was felt necessary to provide general guidance on the use of DC following TBI and identify areas of ongoing uncertainty via a consensus-based approach. Methods: The International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury took place in Cambridge, UK, on the 28th and 29th September 2017. The meeting was jointly organised by the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), AO/Global Neuro and the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma. Discussions and voting were organised around six pre-specified themes: (1) primary DC for mass lesions, (2) secondary DC for intracranial hypertension, (3) peri-operative care, (4) surgical technique, (5) cranial reconstruction and (6) DC in low- and middle-income countries. Results: The invited participants discussed existing published evidence and proposed consensus statements. Statements required an agreement threshold of more than 70% by blinded voting for approval. Conclusions: In this manuscript, we present the final consensus-based recommendations. We have also identified areas of uncertainty, where further research is required, including the role of primary DC, the role of hinge craniotomy and the optimal timing and material for skull reconstruction. © 2019, The Author(s).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceActa Neurochirurgicaen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85067382108&doi=10.1007%2fs00701-019-03936-y&partnerID=40&md5=a46590111ceb7327588f92dab79d30bf
dc.subjectconsensusen
dc.subjectcranioplastyen
dc.subjectdecompressive craniectomyen
dc.subjectglobal healthen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectintracranial hypertensionen
dc.subjectlow income countryen
dc.subjectmiddle income countryen
dc.subjectneurosurgeonen
dc.subjectperioperative perioden
dc.subjectpriority journalen
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial (topic)en
dc.subjectReviewen
dc.subjectsurgical techniqueen
dc.subjecttraumatic brain injuryen
dc.subjectuncertaintyen
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen
dc.subjectcomplicationen
dc.subjectconsensusen
dc.subjectdecompressive craniectomyen
dc.subjectintracranial hypertensionen
dc.subjectproceduresen
dc.subjecttraumatic brain injuryen
dc.subjectBrain Injuries, Traumaticen
dc.subjectConsensusen
dc.subjectDecompressive Craniectomyen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectIntracranial Hypertensionen
dc.subjectSpringer-Verlag Wienen
dc.titleConsensus statement from the International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: Consensus statementen
dc.typeotheren


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record