| dc.creator | Hantes M.E., Ono Y., Raoulis V.A., Doxariotis N., Venouziou A., Zibis A., Vlychou M. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-31T08:27:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-31T08:27:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.1177/0363546517728718 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 03635465 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11615/73890 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and double-row (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid- to long-term clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya’s classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years. Results: Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [P <.05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [P <.05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [P <.05]). Conclusion: The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears. © 2017, © 2017 The Author(s). | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.source | American Journal of Sports Medicine | en |
| dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85039857214&doi=10.1177%2f0363546517728718&partnerID=40&md5=774537d5232aa5ab691865a9921dc67f | |
| dc.subject | adult | en |
| dc.subject | arthroscopy | en |
| dc.subject | comparative study | en |
| dc.subject | female | en |
| dc.subject | human | en |
| dc.subject | male | en |
| dc.subject | middle aged | en |
| dc.subject | nuclear magnetic resonance imaging | en |
| dc.subject | postoperative period | en |
| dc.subject | procedures | en |
| dc.subject | prospective study | en |
| dc.subject | reconstructive surgery | en |
| dc.subject | rotator cuff | en |
| dc.subject | rotator cuff injury | en |
| dc.subject | rupture | en |
| dc.subject | suture | en |
| dc.subject | suture technique | en |
| dc.subject | treatment outcome | en |
| dc.subject | Adult | en |
| dc.subject | Arthroscopy | en |
| dc.subject | Female | en |
| dc.subject | Humans | en |
| dc.subject | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | en |
| dc.subject | Male | en |
| dc.subject | Middle Aged | en |
| dc.subject | Postoperative Period | en |
| dc.subject | Prospective Studies | en |
| dc.subject | Reconstructive Surgical Procedures | en |
| dc.subject | Rotator Cuff | en |
| dc.subject | Rotator Cuff Injuries | en |
| dc.subject | Rupture | en |
| dc.subject | Suture Techniques | en |
| dc.subject | Sutures | en |
| dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | en |
| dc.subject | SAGE Publications Inc. | en |
| dc.title | Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study | en |
| dc.type | journalArticle | en |