Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorHantes M.E., Ono Y., Raoulis V.A., Doxariotis N., Venouziou A., Zibis A., Vlychou M.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T08:27:49Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T08:27:49Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier10.1177/0363546517728718
dc.identifier.issn03635465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/73890
dc.description.abstractBackground: When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and double-row (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid- to long-term clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya’s classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years. Results: Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [P <.05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [P <.05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [P <.05]). Conclusion: The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears. © 2017, © 2017 The Author(s).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceAmerican Journal of Sports Medicineen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85039857214&doi=10.1177%2f0363546517728718&partnerID=40&md5=774537d5232aa5ab691865a9921dc67f
dc.subjectadulten
dc.subjectarthroscopyen
dc.subjectcomparative studyen
dc.subjectfemaleen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectmaleen
dc.subjectmiddle ageden
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance imagingen
dc.subjectpostoperative perioden
dc.subjectproceduresen
dc.subjectprospective studyen
dc.subjectreconstructive surgeryen
dc.subjectrotator cuffen
dc.subjectrotator cuff injuryen
dc.subjectruptureen
dc.subjectsutureen
dc.subjectsuture techniqueen
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectArthroscopyen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectPostoperative Perioden
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen
dc.subjectReconstructive Surgical Proceduresen
dc.subjectRotator Cuffen
dc.subjectRotator Cuff Injuriesen
dc.subjectRuptureen
dc.subjectSuture Techniquesen
dc.subjectSuturesen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectSAGE Publications Inc.en
dc.titleArthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Studyen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής