Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorHalkos G.E., Tsirivis A.S.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T08:27:46Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T08:27:46Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier10.3390/en12203979
dc.identifier.issn19961073
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/73874
dc.description.abstractEnergy is considered as a commodity nowadays and continuous access along with price stability is of vital importance for every economic agent worldwide. The aim of the current review paper is to present in detail the two dominant hedging strategies relative to energy portfolios, the Minimum-Variance hedge ratio and the expected utility maximization methodology. The Minimum-Variance hedge ratio approach is by far the most popular in literature as it is less time consuming and computationally demanding; nevertheless by applying the appropriate multivariate model Garch family volatility model, it can provide a very reliable estimation of the optimal hedge ratio. However, this becomes possible at the cost of a rather restrictive assumption for infinite hedger’s risk aversion. Within an uncertain worldwide economic climate and a highly volatile energy market, energy producers, retailers and consumers had to become more adaptive and develop the necessary energy risk management and optimal hedging strategies. The estimation gap of an optimal hedge ratio that would be subject to the investor’s risk preferences through time is filled by the relatively more complex and sophisticated expected utility maximization methodology. Nevertheless, if hedgers share infinite risk aversion or if alternatively the expected futures price is approximately zero the two methodologies become equivalent. The current review shows that when evidence from the energy market during periods of extremely volatile economic climate is considered, both hypotheses can be violated, hence it becomes reasonable that especially for extended hedging horizons it would be wise for potential hedgers to take into consideration both methodologies in order to build a successful and profitable hedging strategy. © 2019 by the authors.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceEnergiesen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074896896&doi=10.3390%2fen12203979&partnerID=40&md5=5d665be26d2a1a3beabcfed822a8aaa1
dc.subjectCommerceen
dc.subjectInvestmentsen
dc.subjectPower marketsen
dc.subjectRisk managementen
dc.subjectRisk perceptionen
dc.subjectWooden fencesen
dc.subjectEnergy commodityen
dc.subjectExpected utilityen
dc.subjectHedge ratioen
dc.subjectHedging strategiesen
dc.subjectRisk aversionen
dc.subjectFinancial marketsen
dc.subjectMDPI AGen
dc.titleEnergy commodities: A review of optimal hedging strategiesen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem