Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.creatorDoulos L.T., Tsangrassoulis A., Madias E.-N., Niavis S., Kontadakis A., Kontaxis P.A., Kontargyri V.T., Skalkou K., Topalis F., Manolis E., Sinou M., Zerefos S.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T07:58:53Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T07:58:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier10.3390/en13154024
dc.identifier.issn19961073
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/73451
dc.description.abstractDaylight utilization significantly contributes to energy savings in office buildings. However, daylight integration requires careful design so as to include variations in daylight availability and maintain a balance between factors such as lighting quality and heat gain or loss. Designers with proper planning can not only improve the visual environment and create higher-quality spaces, but simultaneously minimize energy costs for buildings. The utilization of photosensors can exploit the benefits of daylighting by dimming the lighting system, so that no excessive luminous flux is produced, thus leading to energy savings as well as visual contentment. However, the human factor is crucial for the proper function of a lighting control system. Without its acceptance from the users, energy savings can be minimized or even negligible. The objective of this paper is to present a post-occupancy evaluation regarding occupant satisfaction and acceptance in relation to daylighting in offices equipped with automated daylight controls. In addition, the response of the users was compared with lighting measurements that were performed during the post-occupancy evaluation. Three case studies of office buildings with installed daylight-harvesting systems were examined. The age of the occupants was a crucial factor concerning their satisfaction in relation to the lighting levels. Aged users were more comfortable with lighting levels over 500lx, while young users were satisfied with 300lx. The impact of different control algorithms was outlined, with the integral reset algorithm performing poorly. The acceptance of the users for the closed loop systems maintained the expected energy savings of the daylight harvesting technique. Most of the occupants preferred to use daylight as a light source combined with artificial light but having the control to either override or switch it on and off at will. The results shown that a post-occupancy survey along with lighting measurements are significant for making an office environment a humancentric one. © 2020 by the authors.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceEnergiesen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090094601&doi=10.3390%2fen13154024&partnerID=40&md5=016f1b2f7c9dc08ead0cb79bb78b7f40
dc.subjectClosed loop systemsen
dc.subjectDaylightingen
dc.subjectLight sourcesen
dc.subjectMan machine systemsen
dc.subjectOffice buildingsen
dc.subjectDaylight availabilityen
dc.subjectDaylight harvestingen
dc.subjectLighting controlsen
dc.subjectOccupant satisfactionen
dc.subjectOffice environmentsen
dc.subjectPost occupancy evaluationen
dc.subjectPost-occupancy surveysen
dc.subjectVisual environmentsen
dc.subjectEnergy conservationen
dc.subjectMDPI AGen
dc.titleExamining the impact of daylighting and the corresponding lighting controls to the users of office buildingsen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée