Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.creatorAlexidis P., Dragoumis D., Karatzoglou S., Drevelegas K., Tzitzikas I., Hatzimouratidis K., Chrisogonidis I., Giannakidis D., Koulouris C., Katsaounis A., Michalopoulos N., Huang H., Li Q., Aidoini Z., Fyntanidou V., Amaniti A., Hohenforst-Schmidt W., Maragouli E., Petanidis S., Zarogoulidis P., Sapalidis K., Kosmidis C., Romanidis K., Oinkonomou P., Vagionas A., Nikolaos-Katsios I., Ioannidis A., Boniou K., Kesisoglou I.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T07:30:51Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T07:30:51Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier10.7150/jca.35510
dc.identifier.issn18379664
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/70415
dc.description.abstractBackground: Prostate cancer is considered to have a special biology which could affect the radiation therapy result based on the selected fractionation scheme. We present the preliminary results of a randomized trial comparing conventionally and hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Methods: Patients included in the study had localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0) and were randomly assigned to mild hypofractionated (72 Gy in 32 fractions, arm1) or conventionally fractionated (74 Gy in 37 fractions, arm2) radiation therapy treatment with Volumetric Arc Therapy technique. The treatment was delivered only to the prostate with or without the seminal vesicles according to physician’s discretion and hormone therapy was optional according to the disease stage and comorbidities. Here we present the preliminary results of acute toxicity from the gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) system. Results: Between 2015 and 2016, 139 patients were enrolled. 67 patients were treated with conventional fractionation and 72 were treated with hypofractionation. Grade≥ 2 toxicity from GU and GI was observed in 23 and 21 patients (31,9% vs 31,3%, p=0,79) and 15 and 12 (20,8% vs 17,9%, p=0,6) for arm1 and arm2 respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between arms in the incidence of early toxicity. There was no correlation observed between patient characteristics and toxicity from either GU or GI. Conclusions: Hypofractionated radiotherapy appears to be equally tolerated compared to conventional fractionation in the early setting. Longer follow up is needed to assess the late toxicity profile of the patients and any potential differences between the control and experimental arm. © The author(s).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceJournal of Canceren
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075906865&doi=10.7150%2fjca.35510&partnerID=40&md5=5f7523639b847737ae0b85093cd0e504
dc.subjectantiandrogenen
dc.subjectgonadorelin derivativeen
dc.subjectprostate specific antigenen
dc.subjecttestosteroneen
dc.subjectacute toxicityen
dc.subjectadulten
dc.subjectageden
dc.subjectandrogen deprivation therapyen
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectcancer stagingen
dc.subjectcomputer assisted tomographyen
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen
dc.subjectgastrointestinal toxicityen
dc.subjectGleason scoreen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjecthypofractionated radiotherapyen
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen
dc.subjectmaleen
dc.subjectoutcome assessmenten
dc.subjectpreliminary dataen
dc.subjectprostate canceren
dc.subjectradiation dose fractionationen
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen
dc.subjectreproductive toxicityen
dc.subjectIvyspring International Publisheren
dc.titleThe role of hypofractionated radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer: Early results of a randomized trialen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

DateienGrößeFormatAnzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige