Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.creatorMylonakis, M. E.en
dc.creatorPapaioannou, N.en
dc.creatorSaridomichelakis, M. N.en
dc.creatorKoutinas, A. F.en
dc.creatorBillinis, C.en
dc.creatorKontos, V. I.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T10:40:15Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T10:40:15Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1939-165X.2005.tb00048.x
dc.identifier.issn0275-6382
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/31230
dc.description.abstractBackground: Lymphadenopathy in canine leishmaniosis has been reported as reactive lymphoid hyperplasia or granulomatous (histiocytic) lymphadenitis. However, we are unaware of information on the effect of latent Leishmania infection on lymph node cytology compared with clinically affected dogs. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to investigate cytologic patterns of lymphadenopathy in dogs with clinical and subclinical forms of leishmaniosis and to correlate cytologic findings with the density of Leishmania amastigotes in fine needle aspiration (FNA) smears. Methods: FNA cytology of prescapular or popliteal lymph nodes was evaluated on 32 dogs with clinical evidence of leishmaniosis (group A), 24 subclinically infected dogs (group B), and 17 clinically healthy noninfected dogs (group C); groups were based on the results of serologic and PCR tests for Leishmania sp. Differential nucleated cell counts (based on 300 cells) and amastigote density were determined microscopically. Cytologic findings were categorized and compared among groups. Results: Cytologic abnormalities were found in 19 of 32 (59.4%) dogs in group A, 1 of 24 (4.2%) dogs in group B, and 2 of 17 (11.8%) dogs in group C and were significantly more frequent in group A than group B (P < .001) or C (P = .001). In group A, 68.7% of the dogs had lymphoid hyperplasia, 12.5% had lymphoid hyperplasia and histiocytic lymphadenitis, 6.3% had histiocytic lymphadenitis, and 3.1% had lymphoid hyperplasia and neutrophilic lymphadenitis. Lymphoid hyperplasia was also noted in 1 dog in group B, and lymphoid hyperplasia and eosinophilic lymphadenitis were each found in 1 dog in group C. Lymph node smears from 31 (96.9%) dogs in group A and 6 (25%) dogs in group B were positive for Leishnaarlia amastigotes; however, no correlation was found between the density of amastigotes and cytopathologic patterns of lymphadenopathy. Conclusion: Abnormal lymph node cytology is much more common in dogs with clinical leishmaniosis than in dogs with subclinical infection, and primarily involves lymphoid hyperplasia. Despite finding no association between the density of amastigotes and type of lymphadenopathy, lymph node cytology still is a valuable diagnostic tool for diagnosing canine leishmaniosis.en
dc.source.uri<Go to ISI>://WOS:000231634700013
dc.subjectcytologyen
dc.subjectdogen
dc.subjectleishmaniosisen
dc.subjectlymph nodeen
dc.subjectlymphadenopathyen
dc.subjectCANINE VISCERAL LEISHMANIASISen
dc.subjectLYMPH-NODE CYTOLOGYen
dc.subjectEHRLICHIA-CANISen
dc.subjectSEROLOGYen
dc.subjectGREECEen
dc.subjectVeterinary Sciencesen
dc.titleCytologic patterns of lymphadenopathy in dogs infected with Leishmania infantumen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée