Show simple item record

dc.creatorHalkos, G. E.en
dc.creatorKyriazis, N. C.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T10:29:41Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T10:29:41Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier10.1007/s10657-006-6648-z
dc.identifier.issn9291261
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/28357
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the issue of harmfulness of tax competition commenting on issues like welfare, growth, redistribution, harmonization and individual freedom. A simple game theoretical ap proach is formulated, where for the first time the two players start from unequal initial conditions, thus influencing strategy and outcomes. Next we propose the new criterion of Optimal Tax Area under which the possibility and feasibility of tax harmonization is examined. The policy implication of our paper is that we do not expect harmonization for direct taxes like corporate taxes in the EU in the near future and if so, harmonization of corporate tax rates on low levels. We conclude that both more theoretic research and empirical evidence are needed before we can answer with certainty whether tax competition is harmful or not. © Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006.en
dc.sourceEuropean Journal of Law and Economicsen
dc.source.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33644918632&partnerID=40&md5=0ed4bad6273cffdf17e417199189387d
dc.subjectHarmonizationen
dc.subjectTax competitionen
dc.subjectWelfareen
dc.titleIs tax competition harmful and is the EU an optimal tax area?en
dc.typejournalArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record