Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorHalkos, G.en
dc.creatorKevork, I.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T10:29:33Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T10:29:33Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier10.1080/00036840600735416
dc.identifier.issn36846
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/28328
dc.description.abstractShowing a dual relationship between ARIMA (0, 2, 1) with parameter θ = -1 and the random walk, a new alternative hypothesis in the form of ARIMA (0, 2,) is established in this article for evaluating unit root tests. The power of four methods of testing for a unit root is investigated under the new alternative, using Monte Carlo simulations. The first method testing θ = -1 in second differences and using a new set of critical values suggested by the two authors in finite samples, is the most appropriate from the integration order point of view. The other three methods refer to tests based on t and φ statistics introduced by Dickey and Fuller, as well as, the nonparametric Phillips-Perron test. Additionally, for cases where for the first method a low power is met, we studied the validity of prediction interval for a future value of ARIMA (0, 2, 1) with θ close but greater of -1, using the prediction equation and the error variance of the random walk. Keeping the forecasting horizon short, the coverage of the interval ranged at expected levels, but its average half-length ranged up to four times more than its true value.en
dc.sourceApplied Economicsen
dc.source.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-36549080144&partnerID=40&md5=775ecf7ccd738bb9948ee6fb49fec99a
dc.subjectMonte Carlo analysisen
dc.subjectnumerical modelen
dc.subjectrandom walk methoden
dc.titleTesting for a unit root under the alternative hypothesis of ARIMA (0, 2, 1)en
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής