Show simple item record

dc.creatorVan Hoovels L., Broeders S., Chan E.K.L., Andrade L., de Melo Cruvinel W., Damoiseaux J., Viander M., Herold M., Coucke W., Heijnen I., Bogdanos D., Calvo-Alén J., Eriksson C., Kozmar A., Kuhi L., Bonroy C., Lauwerys B., Schouwers S., Lutteri L., Vercammen M., Mayer M., Patel D., Egner W., Puolakka K., Tesija-Kuna A., Shoenfeld Y., de Sousa M.J.R., Hoyos M.L., Radice A., Bossuyt X.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T10:25:46Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T10:25:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9
dc.identifier.issn20380305
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/80383
dc.description.abstractBackground: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns. Methods: Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians. Results: 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest. Conclusion: This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive. © 2020, The Author(s).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceAutoimmunity Highlightsen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85096377894&doi=10.1186%2fs13317-020-00139-9&partnerID=40&md5=a7fa9ace42acfda4548e9e7fbed57581
dc.subjectantigenen
dc.subjectantinuclear antibodyen
dc.subjectdouble stranded DNA antibodyen
dc.subjectextractable nuclear antigenen
dc.subjectunclassified drugen
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectBelgian European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiativeen
dc.subjectcentromereen
dc.subjectclinical laboratory personnelen
dc.subjectclinical practiceen
dc.subjectclinical relevanceen
dc.subjectclinicianen
dc.subjectfluorescenceen
dc.subjectfluorescence intensityen
dc.subjectfollow upen
dc.subjectgeographic distributionen
dc.subjectgood laboratory practiceen
dc.subjecthealth care conceptsen
dc.subjecthealth care organizationen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectimmunofluorescenceen
dc.subjectInternational Consensus on ANA Patternsen
dc.subjectmitochondrionen
dc.subjectrheumatologisten
dc.subjectscoring systemen
dc.subjectBioMed Central Ltden
dc.titleCurrent laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international surveyen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record