Mostra i principali dati dell'item

dc.creatorRäty S., Georgiopoulos G., Aarnio K., Martinez-Majander N., Uhl E., Ntaios G., Strbian D.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T09:51:16Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T09:51:16Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106102
dc.identifier.issn10523057
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/78472
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Decompressive hemicraniectomy decreases mortality and severe disability from space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarction in selected patients. However, attitudes towards hemicraniectomy for dominant-hemispheric stroke have been hesitant. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the association of stroke laterality with outcome after hemicraniectomy. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic literature search up to 6th February 2020 to retrieve original articles about hemicraniectomy for space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarction that reported outcome in relation to laterality. The primary outcome was severe disability (modified Rankin Scale 4‒6 or 5‒6 or Glasgow Outcome Scale 1‒3) or death. A two-stage combined individual patient and aggregate data meta-analysis evaluated the association between dominant-lateralized stroke and (a) short-term (≤ 3 months) and (b) long-term (> 3 months) outcome. We performed sensitivity analyses excluding studies with sheer mortality outcome, second-look strokectomy, low quality, or small sample size, and comparing populations from North America/Europe vs Asia/South America. Results: The analysis included 51 studies (46 observational studies, one nonrandomized trial, and four randomized controlled trials) comprising 2361 patients. We found no association between dominant laterality and unfavorable short-term (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.69‒1.45) or long-term (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.76‒1.33) outcome. The results were unchanged in all sensitivity analyses. The grade of evidence was very low for short-term and low for long-term outcome. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that patients with dominant-hemispheric stroke have equal outcome after hemicraniectomy compared to patients with nondominant stroke. Despite the shortcomings of the available evidence, our results do not support withholding hemicraniectomy based on stroke laterality. © 2021 Elsevier Inc.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseasesen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85114910237&doi=10.1016%2fj.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106102&partnerID=40&md5=b0075504e75c32f0b09bafe44e4abdcb
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectAsiaen
dc.subjectcerebral artery diseaseen
dc.subjectcerebrovascular accidenten
dc.subjectclinical outcomeen
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen
dc.subjectdisabilityen
dc.subjectEuropeen
dc.subjectGlasgow outcome scaleen
dc.subjecthemicraniectomyen
dc.subjecthemispheric dominanceen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectintermethod comparisonen
dc.subjectmeta analysisen
dc.subjectNorth Americaen
dc.subjectobservational studyen
dc.subjectpatient attitudeen
dc.subjectRankin scaleen
dc.subjectsensitivity analysisen
dc.subjectSouth Americaen
dc.subjectsurgical mortalityen
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen
dc.subjectdecompressive craniectomyen
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial (topic)en
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen
dc.subjectDecompressive Craniectomyen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectInfarction, Middle Cerebral Arteryen
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectW.B. Saundersen
dc.titleHemicraniectomy for Dominant vs Nondominant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Files in questo item

FilesDimensioneFormatoMostra

Nessun files in questo item.

Questo item appare nelle seguenti collezioni

Mostra i principali dati dell'item