Show simple item record

dc.creatorRaptis A., Tasso P., Batzalexis K., Gallo D., Xenos M., Morbiducci U., Giannoukas A.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T09:51:11Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T09:51:11Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105072
dc.identifier.issn00104825
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/78459
dc.description.abstractBackground: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains the first-line treatment option of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, while stenting (CAS) is reserved for selected patients at high surgical risk. Here, we compare the vascular remodeling process in CEA- and CAS-treated patients with respect to morphological and hemodynamic features, because of their possible engagement in carotid atherosclerosis. Methods: Twelve (12) patients were included, half with patched CEA and half with CAS. Pre- and post-operative 3D image-based models of the carotid bifurcation were anatomically characterized in terms of flare, tortuosity, and curvature. Individual computational fluid dynamics simulations allowed to quantify the postoperative hemodynamic milieu in terms of (1) wall shear stress and (2) helical flow. Results: Carotid flare increased in all cases, but a more marked increase emerged after CEA compared to CAS. Tortuosity and curvature increased after CEA but decreased after CAS. CEA patients presented with significantly higher postoperative tortuosity than CAS patients. CEA was associated with a worse (non-statistically significant) score in all flow disturbance indicators vs. CAS. Conclusion: The increased flare and tortuosity of the carotid bifurcation after CEA vs. CAS is a marked difference in the vascular remodeling process between the two modalities. CAS seems to induce a less pro-restenosis hemodynamic environment compared to CEA. The emerged differences stimulate further analysis on a larger cohort with long-term outcomes, to shed light on the clinical impact of the observations. © 2021 Elsevier Ltden
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceComputers in Biology and Medicineen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85120001920&doi=10.1016%2fj.compbiomed.2021.105072&partnerID=40&md5=5b6c309192ab9a041d27689d3c4b6d59
dc.subjectBifurcation (mathematics)en
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamicsen
dc.subjectDiseasesen
dc.subjectHemodynamicsen
dc.subjectPatient treatmenten
dc.subjectShear flowen
dc.subjectShear stressen
dc.subjectStentsen
dc.subjectCarotid artery stentingen
dc.subjectCarotid bifurcationen
dc.subjectCarotid endarterectomiesen
dc.subjectComputational hemodynamicsen
dc.subjectHaemodynamicsen
dc.subjectHelical flowsen
dc.subjectRemodelingen
dc.subjectVascular remodelingen
dc.subjectWall shear stressen
dc.subjectWall-shear stressen
dc.subjectMorphologyen
dc.subjectageden
dc.subjectArticleen
dc.subjectcarotid artery bifurcationen
dc.subjectcarotid artery stentingen
dc.subjectcarotid atherosclerosisen
dc.subjectcarotid endarterectomyen
dc.subjectclinical articleen
dc.subjectcohort analysisen
dc.subjectcomputational fluid dynamicsen
dc.subjectcomputed tomographic angiographyen
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen
dc.subjectfemaleen
dc.subjecthemodynamicsen
dc.subjecthumanen
dc.subjectintermethod comparisonen
dc.subjectmaleen
dc.subjectmorphologyen
dc.subjectmultidetector computed tomographyen
dc.subjectpatch angioplastyen
dc.subjectpostoperative perioden
dc.subjectpreoperative perioden
dc.subjectshear stressen
dc.subjectvascular remodelingen
dc.subjectElsevier Ltden
dc.titleRemodeling effects of carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in terms of morphology and hemodynamicsen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record