Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorPapageorgiou G.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T09:43:01Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T09:43:01Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier10.25103/jestr.126.20
dc.identifier.issn17919320
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/77670
dc.description.abstractRoad pavement evaluation methods are based either on simple index of a surface characteristic, such as International Roughness Index (IRI) for roughness, Rut Depth (RD) for rutting, Sideway Force Coefficient (SFC) for skid-resistance; or, otherwise, on a complex index such as Pavement Condition Index (PCI), related with an overall consideration of the surface condition. Complex indices are commonly used in the frame of Pavement Management Systems (PMS) by road authorities worldwide, in order to assess the pavement condition and to program maintenance and rehabilitation activities along with keeping their road network up to a safe level for the users. Nowadays, these complex indices are considered to be more reliable and suitable to evaluate pavement condition and prioritize future rehabilitation actions. The first-line question is: is it really so? Meaning that, are indices like Present Serviceability Index (PSI) capable of revealing the real condition without misunderstanding or hidden issues? Can they be implemented in all cases and if so, are they enough accurate to lead road authorities to a safe conclusion and subsequently to the right and effective maintenance activities without misleads and useless costs? In the frame of the present paper, some of the most commonly used evaluation methods are enlightened, so as to dig up their advantages and their deficiencies and finally to assess their degree of efficiency. In terms of appraising pavement evaluation methods using complex indicators, the most common methods used are hereafter examined in an attempt to determine the best one for each case. Although the Australian method seems to be the most complete and reliable one, there is no absolute answer for all the cases, meaning that the best one in terms of mitigated implementation cost is suitable for cases with serious financial constraints, whilst in case of evaluations regardless of budget, the most accurate method is the appropriate one. © 2019 School of Science, IHU.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceJournal of Engineering Science and Technology Reviewen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081064078&doi=10.25103%2fjestr.126.20&partnerID=40&md5=39d513da10f185a3ae8d45e29f133ac0
dc.subjectBudget controlen
dc.subjectComplex networksen
dc.subjectConcrete pavementsen
dc.subjectCostsen
dc.subjectHighway administrationen
dc.subjectPavementsen
dc.subjectSkid resistanceen
dc.subjectSurface roughnessen
dc.subjectAppraisalen
dc.subjectEvaluationen
dc.subjectHighway managementen
dc.subjectInternational roughness indexen
dc.subjectPavement condition indicesen
dc.subjectPavement management systemsen
dc.subjectPresent serviceability indicesen
dc.subjectSideway force coefficient (SFC)en
dc.subjectHighway planningen
dc.subjectEastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technologyen
dc.titleAppraisal of road pavement evaluation methodsen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής