Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorPrassinos, N. N.en
dc.creatorGalatos, A. D.en
dc.creatorRaptopoulos, D.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T10:46:07Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T10:46:07Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00204.x
dc.identifier.issn14672987
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/32492
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare propofol, thiopental and ketamine as induction agents before halothane anaesthesia in goats. Study design: Prospective, randomized cross-over study. Animals: Seven healthy adult female goats with mean (±SD; range) body mass of 38.9 ± 3.29 kg; 35-45 kg. Methods: The seven animals were used on 21 occasions. Each received all three anaesthetics in a randomized cross-over design, with an interval of at least 2 weeks before re-use. Anaesthesia was induced with intravenous (IV) propofol (3 mg kg -1), thiopental (8 mg kg-1, IV) or ketamine (10 mg kg -1, IV). Following tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with halothane for 30 minutes. Indirect blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and arterial blood gases were monitored. The quality of induction and recovery, recovery times and incidence of side-effects were recorded. Results: Induction of anaesthesia was smooth and uneventful, and tracheal intubation was easily performed in all but two goats receiving ketamine. Changes in cardiopulmonary variables and acid-base status were similar with all three induction agents and were within clinically acceptable limits. Mean recovery times (time to recovery of swallowing reflex and to standing) were significantly shorter, and side-effects, e.g. apnoea, regurgitation, hypersalivation and tympany, were less common in goats receiving propofol, compared with the other treatments. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Propofol 3 mg kg-1 IV is superior to thiopental and ketamine as an induction agent before halothane anaesthesia in goats. It provides uneventful recovery which is more rapid than thiopental or ketamine, so reduces anaesthetic risk. © Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, 2005.en
dc.source.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-26944496116&partnerID=40&md5=2f7224317e998a955982763a87e2e0c9
dc.subjectAnaesthesiaen
dc.subjectGoaten
dc.subjectKetamineen
dc.subjectPropofolen
dc.subjectThiopentalen
dc.subjectAnimaliaen
dc.subjectCapra hircusen
dc.subjecthalothaneen
dc.subjectinhalation anesthetic agenten
dc.subjectintravenous anesthetic agenten
dc.subjectanesthesiaen
dc.subjectanesthetic recoveryen
dc.subjectanimalen
dc.subjectanimal diseaseen
dc.subjectarticleen
dc.subjectclinical trialen
dc.subjectcomparative studyen
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trialen
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen
dc.subjectcrossover procedureen
dc.subjectexperimental animalen
dc.subjectfemaleen
dc.subjecthemodynamicsen
dc.subjectphysiologyen
dc.subjectprospective studyen
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen
dc.subjectAnesthesia Recovery Perioden
dc.subjectAnesthetics, Inhalationen
dc.subjectAnesthetics, Intravenousen
dc.subjectAnimalsen
dc.subjectAnimals, Laboratoryen
dc.subjectCross-Over Studiesen
dc.subjectGoatsen
dc.subjectHemodynamic Processesen
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen
dc.titleA comparison of propofol, thiopental or ketamine as induction agents in goatsen
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής